Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00241)

Zecharia Sitchin has done good scholarly work in many respects, and 
his work has many shortcomings as well.  I don't hang my hat on 
Sitchin's work with good certainty on several issues.  Sitchin is a 
semitic scholar and all his work is projected from a semitic 
viewpoint.  Further, he tends to be heavily materialistic; although, 
he may be forced in that position by what academia will tolerate.  

Krsanna

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "DENNIS KIER" <kier10@...> wrote:
>
> All this sounds like it tends to support the books of Zecharia 
Sitchin about 
> the pre-history of the area. He suggests a lot about the polished 
stone that 
> his mega builders used all around the world. He wrote 6 or 7 
volumes on the 
> history that he translates from the ancient  Sumerian tablets, and 
> illustrations.
> 
> It is too bad that the large book by L. Taylor Hansen, "The 
Ancient 
> Atlantic" is out of print. She seems to address this kind of thing 
in her 
> researches.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "krsanna" <timestar@...>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2006 1:14 PM
> Subject: Theos-World Ruins off he coast of Cuba
> 
> 
> Some of the same individuals named on this web site stated that the
> layout of the ruins most closely resembled Teotihuacan, shortlly
> after the initial exploration.  The granite composition of
> the "megalithic" structures clearly shows that the site is human-
> made, because granite used in the construction is foreign to Cuba.
> 
> http://www.marsearthconnection.com/cuba.html
> 
> ..."Samples that we recovered from the ocean bottom have justified
> our structures that we call megalithic structures. The samples are
> granite stone, completely polished, with some incrustations of
> fossils. Fossils of organic creatures that normally live on the
> surface, not on the ocean bottom. This is very interesting because
> this is evidence that the whole surface sank to the depth of 700
> meters (2,297 feet, or about a half mile down).
> 
> The area has been seismically active for thousands of years. And
> what we find on the ocean bottom are fractures from which the magma
> and volcanic ash came out. From these structures we were able to
> delineate a configuration of the land that sank because you can see
> them clearly. The land that sank is very obvious from our image of
> the ocean bottom. And you can see bays, like harbors, and it's all
> at the depths of 900 and 700 meters...We think there was a series 
of
> islands between Cuba and the Yucatan. There could have been sinking
> 15,000 years ago...
> 
> The stone we recovered from ocean bottom is very polished granite.
> All of the peninsula of northwast part of Cuba, all of this
> peninsula is limestone, very fractured limestone. So, geologically,
> it (megalithic granite structures) is totally foreign to Cuba. But
> it's also not known in Yucatan because Yucatan is also limestone,
> not granite...
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@ wrote:
> >
> > Check out:
> >
> > http://www.marsearthconnection.com/cuba.html
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 3/5/06 2:32:24 PM, timestar@ writes:
> >
> >
> > > Information provided to HPB by living residents of Peru was the
> > > source of her discovery of the Andean center, with the many
> miles of
> > > caves she mentions in "Isis Unveiled." She employed the
> testimony
> > > of residents.
> > >
> > > Discoveries as recent as 2001 enlarge the possibility of 
ancient
> > > centers of learning that disseminated "the secret doctrine"
> > > considerably. Cuban and Russian scientists did an initial
> survey of
> > > sunken pyramids in the Caribbean, off the coast of Cuba, in 
2001
> to
> > > determine that the sunken pyramids most closely resemble those 
at
> > > Teotihuacan. These sank long before they were recorded in any
> known
> > > literature. The sunken pyramids in the Caribbean are truly
> ancient
> > > and lost in history.
> > >
> > > The location in the Caribbean is memorialized in the pyramids 
at
> > > Teotihuacan, built betweeen 300 and 100 BCE. The location off
> the
> > > coast of Cuba is identified in the TimeStar geometry, and I
> > > published that location as the likely site of pyramids in 1997,
> > > before the Cubans announced the discovery.
> > >
> > > Cuba is an ideal location for a base between the Mediterranean
> and
> > > Mexico. Cortes sailed from Cuba when first traveling to
> > > Mexico. "The Feathered Serpent," Quetzalcoatl, who gave numbers
> and
> > > letters to Mexico, sailed towards Cuba when he left Mexico. The
> > > discovery of these sunken pyramids and place references 
pointing
> to
> > > the Caribbean embedded at Teotihuacan is specific and
> significant in
> > > this regard.
> > >
> > > You will be hearing much more about the sunken pyramids near
> Cuba,
> > > when the Cubans and Russians are ready to publish. The Cubans
> have
> > > refused U.S. assistance with the newly discovered pyramids and
> hired
> > > Canadians to do the technical work for the 2001 exploration. 
Not
> > > much is heard about the pyramids in the U.S., 
although "National
> > > Geograhic" published a small amount of information.
> > >
> > > Krsanna Duran
>