theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

For Daniel to Answer

Feb 25, 2006 06:43 AM
by carlosaveline cardoso aveline


Dear Daniel,

This is for you to asnwer,  Carlos.

From: "kpauljohnson" <kpauljohnson@yahoo.com>
Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Theos-World Last word from me until April; comment on John's post
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:53:39 -0000

Hey,

My current manuscript is suffering from lack of attention, and I had
intended to give a few days' notice before taking a two month hiatus
from the discussion here starting at the beginning of March.  But
there is really nothing more for me to say; having been drawn into
what is essentially an inter-Theosophical quarrel I now must let
Theosophists work these things out among themselves.  When I return
after a couple of months away, perhaps more will have come to light
that will clarify matters.

As for John's implicit threat, a lawsuit would certainly be an
interesting way to get to the bottom of the David Green mystery.
Let's separate two questions here.  1) Is David Green a real person?
and 2) If not, who is the author of Green's articles and messages on
theos-talk?

As to the first question, apart from all the evidence already cited,
there is a marked internal inconsistency that strongly indicates a
false persona.  Quite a few of Green's messages are written in a
peculiar style marked by certain odd mannerisms.  Like always calling
HPB "Mrs. Blavatsky" and constantly leaving off articles (a, an and
the).  This seems like someone for whom English is not a first
language.  But then in other messages, most of them in fact, his
English is perfectly normal.  This seems like someone is forgetting
to "stay in character."

As to the second question, Brigitte Muehlegger was clearly not in
sufficient command of English spelling or syntax to have written the
Green messages, nor did she ever show one iota of interest in Green's
preoccupation with attacking the ULT.  Someone else has. If we accept
the premise that Green is not real, then the obvious person to ask
for an explanation is his alleged co-author who has described knowing
him personally.

I'll be unsubscribing this afternoon, but will read today's messages
before doing so.

Paul








Yahoo! Groups Links







_________________________________________________________________
Seja um dos primeiros a testar o novo Windows Live Mail Beta. Acesse http://www.ideas.live.com/programpage.aspx?versionId=5d21c51a-b161-4314-9b0e-4911fb2b2e6d



[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application