Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00555)

Couple of days ago while watching the Court Channel on TV, I noticed the
existence of a computer program which analyzes writings to determine if two
sets of doucuments were written by the same person. The program analyzes the
vocabulary and the usage of verbs and nouns etc to detect patterns which
will lead to identification of the author of documents. It is being used to
solve criminal cases. Someone in law enforcement may know more about it.
Then we can use the program to solve the issue of authorship in question.

mkr

On 2/24/06, kpauljohnson <kpauljohnson@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> My current manuscript is suffering from lack of attention, and I had
> intended to give a few days' notice before taking a two month hiatus
> from the discussion here starting at the beginning of March.  But
> there is really nothing more for me to say; having been drawn into
> what is essentially an inter-Theosophical quarrel I now must let
> Theosophists work these things out among themselves.  When I return
> after a couple of months away, perhaps more will have come to light
> that will clarify matters.
>
> As for John's implicit threat, a lawsuit would certainly be an
> interesting way to get to the bottom of the David Green mystery.
> Let's separate two questions here.  1) Is David Green a real person?
> and 2) If not, who is the author of Green's articles and messages on
> theos-talk?
>
> As to the first question, apart from all the evidence already cited,
> there is a marked internal inconsistency that strongly indicates a
> false persona.  Quite a few of Green's messages are written in a
> peculiar style marked by certain odd mannerisms.  Like always calling
> HPB "Mrs. Blavatsky" and constantly leaving off articles (a, an and
> the).  This seems like someone for whom English is not a first
> language.  But then in other messages, most of them in fact, his
> English is perfectly normal.  This seems like someone is forgetting
> to "stay in character."
>
> As to the second question, Brigitte Muehlegger was clearly not in
> sufficient command of English spelling or syntax to have written the
> Green messages, nor did she ever show one iota of interest in Green's
> preoccupation with attacking the ULT.  Someone else has. If we accept
> the premise that Green is not real, then the obvious person to ask
> for an explanation is his alleged co-author who has described knowing
> him personally.
>
> I'll be unsubscribing this afternoon, but will read today's messages
> before doing so.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]