Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00451)

Pedro,

Thank you  for you "maybe, maybe-not" commentaries.

But, if you and Adyar defend the accuracy of CWL' s Martian and
Mercurian reports, why have them disappeared from his book?

Perhaps you can explain to us all why did the
USA TPH timidly remove such important astronomical and
socio-astronomical discoveries from the recent editions
of "Inner Life"?

Why silently stealing from the readers these
precious texts as if they were some absurd fancies?


In any case, you have some more Leadbeaterian texts on Mars'
daily life in a posting by me today.

We have to recover this valuable texts unfortunately put into
oblivion, don't we?

I also have one more special question to you,
and I hope you can share your views with us.

Do you believe, Pedro,  that the Liberal Catholic
Church, L.C.C. , might have a Christian mission
working in Mars by now?

After all, its founder went there personally several
times.  Let us know if you discover anything about that.

CWL wrote there was no religion in MARS. Why would he
visit there, then, except for taking the Bible and some missionaries?


Best regards,  Carlos.







> From: "prmoliveira" <prmoliveira@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Theos-World Re: Pedro Oliveira, HPB, NASA & MARS
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:49:55 -0000
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline cardoso aveline"
> <carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> > As a former International Secretary of the Adyar TS who lived for
> several
> > years in Adyar, perhaps you would give us all some commentaries on
> the
> > accuracy of these revelations about MARS, made by the remarkably
> clairvoyant
> > writer Charles Leadbeater, SEE BELOW.
>
>
> Not being a clairvoyant myself I am not in a position to comment on
> his observations. Personally, I think he was just offering his view
> on the subject. But it is interesting to note that the following
> passage from "The Secret Doctrine", vol. 2, addenda IV-B, seems to
> consider the possibility of life in other planets:
>
>
> "Venus, like Mercury, has a very dense atmosphere, as also has Mars
> and the snows which cover their poles, the clouds which hide their
> surface, the geographical configuration of their seas and
> continents, the variations of seasons and climates, are all closely
> analogous — at least to the eye of the physical astronomer.  But
> such facts and the considerations to which they give rise, have
> reference only to the possibility of the existence on these planets
> of human life as known on earth.  That some forms of life such as we
> know are possible on these planets, has been long since abundantly
> demonstrated, and it seems perfectly useless to go into detailed
> questions of the physiology, etc., etc., of these hypothetical
> inhabitants, since after all the reader can arrive only at an
> imaginary extension of his familiar surroundings.  It is better to
> rest content with the three conclusions which M. C. Flammarion, whom
> we have so largely quoted, formulates as rigorous and exact
> deductions from the known facts and laws of science.
>
> I. The various forces which were active in the beginning of
> evolution gave birth to a great variety of beings on the several
> worlds; both in the organic and inorganic kingdoms.
>
> II. The animated beings were constituted from the first according to
> forms and organisms in correlation with the physiological state of
> each inhabited globe.
>
> III. The humanities of other worlds differ from us, as much in their
> inner organization as in their external physical type."
>
>
> > I also would like you to clarify one more issue,  please.
> >
> >
> > When, back in 1999,  you said to me and to other Brazilian
> students that the
> > USA TPH was going to publish "a letter from Blavatsky" in which
> she
> > confessed she had 'a night of love' , did you know, by then, that
> the source
> > of such a misinformation was Mr. Solvyov, a liar and libeller
> considered
> > "fifty times worse than the Colulombs" by no other than Mr. Henry
> Olcott in
> > his memories?   Why did you not investigate the source of the
> information
> > before making it circulate?  Was it because Leadbeater's literary
> fancies
> > were getting visible,  and attacking HPB with false charge was a
> way of
> > preserving the image of CWL's literary "achievement"???  Just
> asking, I
> > believe you are the one who can clarify that.
>
>
> I will reserve my opinion on your claim until after the publication
> of the second volume of The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky.
>
>
> pedro
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________
Com o MSN Spaces você divide seu blog, suas fotos, sua lista de música e 
muito mais com seus amigos! Crie já o seu espaço online e com seus amigos! E 
só entra no   http://spaces.msn.com/