Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00434)

I recall HPB mentioning in the SD, that space everywhere in the Universe is
populated by living entities, even though we may not be cognizant of the
fact.

Also from my personal point of view, the usefulness of info modern theosophy
provided to us is most important to me in helping me to grow than whether a
particular statement or comment made by an individual (who may be highly
evolved or not) is true or not.

One day we all, each one of us, I hope, in the distant future, may be able
to verify and confirm or otherwise the factual truth of all the written
material.

Ramadoss

On 2/19/06, prmoliveira <prmoliveira@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline cardoso aveline"
> <carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> > As a former International Secretary of the Adyar TS who lived for
> several
> > years in Adyar, perhaps you would give us all some commentaries on
> the
> > accuracy of these revelations about MARS, made by the remarkably
> clairvoyant
> > writer Charles Leadbeater, SEE BELOW.
>
>
> Not being a clairvoyant myself I am not in a position to comment on
> his observations. Personally, I think he was just offering his view
> on the subject. But it is interesting to note that the following
> passage from "The Secret Doctrine", vol. 2, addenda IV-B, seems to
> consider the possibility of life in other planets:
>
>
> "Venus, like Mercury, has a very dense atmosphere, as also has Mars
> and the snows which cover their poles, the clouds which hide their
> surface, the geographical configuration of their seas and
> continents, the variations of seasons and climates, are all closely
> analogous — at least to the eye of the physical astronomer.  But
> such facts and the considerations to which they give rise, have
> reference only to the possibility of the existence on these planets
> of human life as known on earth.  That some forms of life such as we
> know are possible on these planets, has been long since abundantly
> demonstrated, and it seems perfectly useless to go into detailed
> questions of the physiology, etc., etc., of these hypothetical
> inhabitants, since after all the reader can arrive only at an
> imaginary extension of his familiar surroundings.  It is better to
> rest content with the three conclusions which M. C. Flammarion, whom
> we have so largely quoted, formulates as rigorous and exact
> deductions from the known facts and laws of science.
>
> I. The various forces which were active in the beginning of
> evolution gave birth to a great variety of beings on the several
> worlds; both in the organic and inorganic kingdoms.
>
> II. The animated beings were constituted from the first according to
> forms and organisms in correlation with the physiological state of
> each inhabited globe.
>
> III. The humanities of other worlds differ from us, as much in their
> inner organization as in their external physical type."
>
>
> > I also would like you to clarify one more issue,  please.
> >
> >
> > When, back in 1999,  you said to me and to other Brazilian
> students that the
> > USA TPH was going to publish "a letter from Blavatsky" in which
> she
> > confessed she had 'a night of love' , did you know, by then, that
> the source
> > of such a misinformation was Mr. Solvyov, a liar and libeller
> considered
> > "fifty times worse than the Colulombs" by no other than Mr. Henry
> Olcott in
> > his memories?   Why did you not investigate the source of the
> information
> > before making it circulate?  Was it because Leadbeater's literary
> fancies
> > were getting visible,  and attacking HPB with false charge was a
> way of
> > preserving the image of CWL's literary "achievement"???  Just
> asking, I
> > believe you are the one who can clarify that.
>
>
> I will reserve my opinion on your claim until after the publication
> of the second volume of The Letters of H. P. Blavatsky.
>
>
> pedro
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]