Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00144)

Dear Friends,


More "flooding", and endless repetition of the same multiple messages in the 
same internet group.

If it is not conscious "flooding", it might be some kind of anxiety to be 
read and accepted. I do not know.   Haven't you seen this before?

Carlos.



> From: "Daniel H. Caldwell" <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com
> Subject: Theos-World Misleading Statement in Mr. Aveline's Critique of 
> ESOTERIC WORLD OF MADAME BLAVATSKY
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:17:42 -0800 (PST)
>
> Misleading Statement in Mr. Aveline's Critique of
> ESOTERIC WORLD OF MADAME BLAVATSKY
>
> In his FOHAT article (which was also repeated in THE
> AQUARIAN THEOSOPHIST), Carlos Aveline wrote:
>
> -------------------------------------------
> In the disgusting volume THE ESOTERIC WORLD OF MADAME
> BLAVATSKY - while believing the editor has selected
> truthful documents - the reader will bump into many of
> the lies written against HPB.
>
> There he will see two texts by Emma Coulomb ... with
> no word from the "editor" Daniel Caldwell admitting he
> is publishing documents which have no trace of truth
> in them whatsoever.
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Notice what Mr. Aveline writes:
>
> ....NO WORD from the editor....
>
> I ask:  Is this statement by Mr. Aveline correct,
> truthful and factual?
>
> CONTRARY to what Mr. Aveline writes, some of the
> editorial notes in my book do call the reader's
> attention to the conflicting testimony and even to the
> falsity of these charges against HPB.
>
> Here are some of my notes to the readers:
>
> p. 205: "Emma Coulomb later claimed that she
> collaborated with HPB at Adyar, as she had earlier in
> Bombay, in producing false phenomena; however, her
> descriptions of what she did are not consistent with
> the observatations of others, who witnessed the
> phenomena, both Indian and Westerners, as some of the
> following selections demonstrate."
>
> p. 263: "Meanwhile, a vicious attack on Blavatsky by
> two of her staff members at Adyar, Alexis and Emma
> Coulomb, was rapidly building up....She wished to sue
> the couple, already dismissed from Adyar for their
> gross libel concerning her supposedly fraudulent
> production of psychic phenomena...."
>
> p. 264: "The Coulomb attack, as was later evident, had
> no solid foundation whatsoever...."
>
> p. 406: "In May 1884, the Coulomb couple were expelled
> from the Theosophial Society for theft, attempted
> extortion and slander...."
>
> p. 264: "In 1963, Adlai Waterman....refuted Hodgson's
> contentions against Madame Blavatsky....Another
> refutation of some of Hodgson's charges against HPB is
> Vernon Harison's article...."
>
> Of course, many of Hodgson's contentions were based on
> the Coulomb testimony.
>
> In light of these notes, why did Mr. Aveline write
> what he did?
>
> One might conclude that Mr. Aveline either didn't
> carefully read my book to know about these notes or
> else he didn't want his readers to know that I had
> added such comments.
>
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> http://hpb.cc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________
Com o MSN Spaces você divide seu blog, suas fotos, sua lista de música e 
muito mais com seus amigos! Crie já o seu espaço online e com seus amigos! E 
só entra no   http://spaces.msn.com/