Theos-Talk Archives (February 2006 Message tt00141)

Dear Friends,

I heard that sending  many texts, and repeating them over and over into a 
internet group
is a kind of technique for calling attention. The technique is called 
"flooding", by which someone
tries to "occupy" the internet group. I hope Daniel Caldwell  is not doing 
this, nor consciously, nor unconsciously.

Peace to all beings,

Best regards,  Carlos.

> From: "Daniel H. Caldwell" <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> To: danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com
> Subject: Theos-World Misleading Statement in Mr. Aveline's Critique of 
> ESOTERIC WORLD OF MADAME BLAVATSKY
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:17:42 -0800 (PST)
>
> Misleading Statement in Mr. Aveline's Critique of
> ESOTERIC WORLD OF MADAME BLAVATSKY
>
> In his FOHAT article (which was also repeated in THE
> AQUARIAN THEOSOPHIST), Carlos Aveline wrote:
>
> -------------------------------------------
> In the disgusting volume THE ESOTERIC WORLD OF MADAME
> BLAVATSKY - while believing the editor has selected
> truthful documents - the reader will bump into many of
> the lies written against HPB.
>
> There he will see two texts by Emma Coulomb ... with
> no word from the "editor" Daniel Caldwell admitting he
> is publishing documents which have no trace of truth
> in them whatsoever.
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Notice what Mr. Aveline writes:
>
> ....NO WORD from the editor....
>
> I ask:  Is this statement by Mr. Aveline correct,
> truthful and factual?
>
> CONTRARY to what Mr. Aveline writes, some of the
> editorial notes in my book do call the reader's
> attention to the conflicting testimony and even to the
> falsity of these charges against HPB.
>
> Here are some of my notes to the readers:
>
> p. 205: "Emma Coulomb later claimed that she
> collaborated with HPB at Adyar, as she had earlier in
> Bombay, in producing false phenomena; however, her
> descriptions of what she did are not consistent with
> the observatations of others, who witnessed the
> phenomena, both Indian and Westerners, as some of the
> following selections demonstrate."
>
> p. 263: "Meanwhile, a vicious attack on Blavatsky by
> two of her staff members at Adyar, Alexis and Emma
> Coulomb, was rapidly building up....She wished to sue
> the couple, already dismissed from Adyar for their
> gross libel concerning her supposedly fraudulent
> production of psychic phenomena...."
>
> p. 264: "The Coulomb attack, as was later evident, had
> no solid foundation whatsoever...."
>
> p. 406: "In May 1884, the Coulomb couple were expelled
> from the Theosophial Society for theft, attempted
> extortion and slander...."
>
> p. 264: "In 1963, Adlai Waterman....refuted Hodgson's
> contentions against Madame Blavatsky....Another
> refutation of some of Hodgson's charges against HPB is
> Vernon Harison's article...."
>
> Of course, many of Hodgson's contentions were based on
> the Coulomb testimony.
>
> In light of these notes, why did Mr. Aveline write
> what he did?
>
> One might conclude that Mr. Aveline either didn't
> carefully read my book to know about these notes or
> else he didn't want his readers to know that I had
> added such comments.
>
> Daniel H. Caldwell
> http://hpb.cc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
_________________________________________________________________
Copa 2006: Sabe como se diz ‘pênalti’ em alemão? Clique aqui! 
http://copa.br.msn.com/extra/dicionario/l-z/