theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Anand wrote: "I don't recommend writing of Blavatsky for various reasons...."

Dec 22, 2005 07:38 AM
by arhat_buddhism


I refuse Annie Besant and Charles Leadbeater writings.


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell" 
<danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:
>
> Anand,
> 
> In one of your emails, you wrote:
> 
> "...I don't recommend writing of Blavatsky for 
> various reasons...."
> 
> Can you please state what those various
> reasons are?
> 
> Furthermore, even though you don't recommend
> Blavatsky's writings, the Master K.H. does.
> 
> Since you apparently believe in the Master K.H.
> and you even quote from some of his letters 
> approvingly why do you ignore this recommendation
> by K.H.:
> 
> "I have also noted, your thoughts about the 'Secret Doctrine.' Be 
> assured that what she [HPB] has not annotated from scientific and 
> other works, we have given or suggested to her. Every mistake or 
> erroneous notion, corrected and explained by her from the works of 
> other theosophists was corrected by me, or under my instruction. It 
> is a more valuable work than its predecessor, an epitome of occult 
> truths that will make it a source of information and instruction 
for 
> the earnest student for long years to come. . . ." Letters from the 
> Masters of the Wisdom, Series I, p. 47
> 
> Anand, if you revere the Masters as you once wrote to me,
> why do you not recommend THE SECRET DOCTRINE especially
> since according to KH he worked closely with HPB on
> THE SECRET DOCTRINE and even corrected and explained teachings
> misunderstood by some Theosophists in this work??
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
>










[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application