Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00204)

-Hi .
If I can believe the work of Mario Schoenmaker, priest from Australia 
LCC

He wrote a book of evolution. Occult worldhistory in a nutshell


Our past we became from old moon and future is new Jupiter for the 
fifth round and the sixth round will be new Venus.
Some more should have written over that I think.

Greetings Christina









Hi-- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Kathy" <silva_cass@y...> wrote:
>
> Again, this seems to differ from what CWL and AB spoke of:
> 
> "Reincarnation, ie. the appearance of the same individual, or 
rather 
> of his astral monad, twice on the same planet, is not as a rule in 
> nature; it is an exception; like the teratological phenomenon of a 
> two headed infant. It is preceded by a violation of the laws of 
> harmony of nature, and happens only when the latter, seeking to 
> restore its disturbed equilibrium, violently throws back into earth-
> life the astral monad which has been tossed out of the circle of 
> necessity by crime or accident. Thus in case of abortion, of 
> infants dying before a certain age, and of congenital and incurable 
> idiocy, nature's original design to produce a perfect human being, 
> has been interrupted. Therefore, while the gross matter of each of 
> these several entities is suffered to disperse itself at death, 
> through the vast realm of being, the immortal spirit and astral 
> monad of the individual - the latter having been set apart to 
> animate a frame and the former to shed its divine light on the 
> corporeal organization - must try a second time to carry out the 
> purpose of the creative intelligence" P351
> 
> This suggests that a) If we were Atlanteans that the reason for 
this 
> incarnation on earth is that, we at that time, disturbed our 
> equilibrium or that we did not carry out the purpose that we 
> ascribed to ourselves.
> 
> b) Our past life was spent on another globe - perhaps the Moon?
> 
> c) Our future life will be spent on yet another globe - perhaps 
> Venus?
> 
> d) Perhaps there is another explanation?
> 
> Cass
>