Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00076)

Daniel, I still think that your 
interpretation of GdeP's words is misleading.
Don't you see the difference between to have 
knowledge and issue knowledge?

Daniel, should I think from your words that 
you believe that HPB's knowledge was limited 
to that was she wrote and that she published 
all that she knew?
Frank


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "danielhcaldwell" 
<danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 1:41 AM
Subject: Theos-World Frank: "I do not think 
that GdeP said this."


>From one of our webpages, Frank, you quote
the following:

"G. de Purucker, Tingley's successor,
testified that the Masters M. & K.H. came to
visit him in 1929 at Theosophical Society
headquarters, Point Loma, San Diego,
California. Purucker claimed that he was
allowed to give out deeper esoteric teachings
than HPB, Judge or Tingley had."
http://blavatskyarchives.com/moderntheosophy.htm)

You then write:

"I do not think that GdeP said this."

Frank, below I give some of what
G. de Purucker wrote:

"...Consequently, it will be my duty as
soon as time and strength permit me to do
so, to issue new E.S. teachings of a far
deeper and more esoteric kind than
those which were issued even by H.P.B.
or by W.Q.J., or by our beloved,
Katherine Tingley...."

Therefore, I do not think it is incorrect
to summarize that as follows:

"Purucker claimed that he was
allowed to give out deeper esoteric teachings
than HPB, Judge or Tingley had."

Let each reader decide the issue.

Daniel






Yahoo! Groups Links


theos-talk-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com