Theos-Talk Archives (December 2005 Message tt00066)

-
Hi All, 
As everywhere the same in religions, opinions etc.All seperations 
made by humans.
As Jezus have said, there is only one God,religion and Truth, all is 
Unity in Universal Wisdom.
best regards.
Christina.L.
















-- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "W.Dallas TenBroeck" 
<dalval14@e...> wrote:
>
> 12/11/2005 4:21 AM
> 
> Friends:
> 
> The posting quoted below is a perfect example of
> 
> 
> "THROWING MUD IN THE FACE OF THE TEACHER."
> 
> 
> 
> Why did the Mahatmas choose HPB as their Messenger ?
> 
> 
> Without her life and efforts there would be no THEOSOPHICAL 
SOCIETY .
> We are all in her debt.
> 
> Dallas TenBroeck
> 
> ==================================
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> From: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Anand Gholap
> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 1:18 AM
> To: 
> Subject: Blavatsky's writing was cause of every split in the 
THEOSOPHICAL
> SOCIETY
> 
> 
> The Theosophical Society was founded in 1875. Adyar TS due to
> Masters' blessings got many good writers like Annie Besant, Charles
> Leadbeater, Geoffrey Hodson, I.K. Taimni, Clara Codd, C.
> Jinarajadasa, G.S.Arundale. Writings of all these authors was widely
> read and was popular. But students of these authors never separated
> from the Theosophical Society and never formed other society or
> group. Readers and students of these authors never became cause of
> split of the TS. They remained with Adyar TS.
> 
> If we observe history, we find that every time Theosophical Society
> split, those separatist groups were composed of students of
> Blavatsky's writing and believed in dogmatic and fundamentalist
> manner that Blavatsky only knew truth, nobody else. They hated all
> other leaders and writers. 
> 
> 
> TS was meant to form Universal Brotherhood and tolerance but 
> these students of Blavatsky hated all other writers and eventually 
> separated, split society and continued hating it. 
> 
> As it happened again and again among students of Blavatsky's 
writing, it is
> perfectly clear that Blavatsky's writing develops negative, divisive
> tendencies among people. 
> 
> Blavatsky's writing is highly risky for Adyar TS.
>