theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Shearman versus Blavatsky on Theosophy?????

Aug 24, 2005 10:48 PM
by Perry Coles


Hi Daniel, Jerry and All,
Maybe one of the problems comes from the use of the word `theosophy'.
As an example in a section on Christianity in a library you will have many different 
presentations or versions of that religion known as `Christianity'.
Some writers agree in some areas and completely conflict in others……this is the problem 
with labels.

Maybe the way `theosophy' needs to be approached is examining and comparing the 
ideas expressed rather than the labels and connotations that have become attached to the 
term `theosophy'.

Know one has a monopoly on this term `theosophy' and I think the reality isnow it has 
become a kind of barrier and a stumbling block within the movement.

Some theosophical groups only concentrate on Blavatsky's writings or maybe William Q 
Judge or the Mahatma letters which is valid within their own mandates.

The Adyar Society as I understand it is simply states the 3 objects as its reason for being 
and does not hold any writing or writer as being definitive of `true theosophy' and follows 
that rationale.

Each writer perhaps needs to be approached according to their own merit or lack there of 
and maybe we need to get away from trying to possess or own this term theosophy or 
simply associate with certain writers or writings.

Perry


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel H. Caldwell" <danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:
> H.P.B. in Volume I of The Secret Doctrine told her readers:
> 
> ". . . the SECRET DOCTRINE is not a treatise, or a series of vague 
> theories, but contains all that can be given out to the world in 
> this century." The Secret Doctrine, 1888, Vol I, p. xxxviii 
> (original edition) 
> 
> And a few lines above these two paragraphs, one reads:
> 
> ". . . But it will take centuries before much more is given from it 
> [the Secret Archaic Doctrine]. . . . " 
> 
> Later, HPB wrote:
> 
> "The Secret Doctrine is the accumulated Wisdom of the Ages, and its 
> cosmogony alone is the most stupendous and elaborate system. The 
> facts have actually occupied countless generations of initiated 
> seers and prophets to marshal, to set down and explain. The flashing 
> gaze of those seers has penetrated into the very kernel of matter, 
> and recorded the soul of things there. The [Esoteric] system is no 
> fancy of one or several isolated individuals. It is the 
> uninterrupted record covering thousands of generations of Seers 
> whose respective experiences were made to test and to verify the 
> teachings of higher and exalted beings, who watched over the 
> childhood of Humanity. For long ages, the 'Wise Men' of the Fifth 
> Race had passed their lives in learning by checking, testing, and 
> verifying in every department of nature the traditions of old by the 
> independent visions of great adepts; i.e., men who have developed 
> and perfected their physical, mental, psychic, and spiritual 
> organisations to the utmost possible degree. No vision of one adept 
> was accepted till it was checked and confirmed by the visions --- so 
> obtained as to stand as independent evidence --- of other adepts, 
> and by centuries of experiences." 
> [Collated from The Secret Doctrine, Vol. I, pp. 273-274 with some 
> phrases & sentences silently deleted.]
> 
> The main tenets of this Esoteric System are given in the pages of 
> THE SECRET DOCTRINE as well in the thousands of other pages of HPB's 
> writings.






[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application