Theos-Talk Archives (August 2005 Message tt00190)

The further you get along in initiation, the less you could give a
crap about sex and money. I'm sure many of you found this out.

They both give you temporary, superficial pleasure, that is not as
satisfactory as, say, emotional tranquility (for instance, it is
better to marry someone you can depend, who makes you happy and always
keeps you on course, rather than a rich nymphomaniac).

-Mark H.

On 8/14/05, Cass Silva <silva_cass@yahoo.com> wrote:
> To have many or to be one of many? Our sexuality keeps us grounded on the lowest levels of the astral plane. I believe that Sexuality in nature is about procreation of the species, and that once we get that, we will begin to understand that emotional and intellectual exchange could be far more satisfying than the exchange of physical fluids.
> 
> Sex is a physical act and not an emotional response to love. Driven by adesire for pleasure and romantic love, we have mixed them up. Generally speaking some women get this, many men don't. They (men) see the act of sex as confirmation of being loved whereas many women prefer emotional closeness. I personally would like to see a leader as one who has conquered his/her sexual appetite, otherwise, they will be continually tempted as was thecase with C.W.L. and to a lesser extent Annie Besant.
> 
> The masters tell us that conquering the physical is comparatively easy compared to conquering our emotional and thought responses, so how far have we advanced? A fifth root race person would be considered out of step with society with the attitude that sex is a means to an end and not an end in itself.
> 
> Cass
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Mark Hamilton Jr.
waking.adept@gmail.com