Theos-Talk Archives (July 2005 Message tt00062)

Konstantin:
One simple question. It is widely believed that Mahatma Letters
are created by so called precipitation. The Master has the image in
his mind and produces the letter by means of materialization. But
WHY all the letters are in the handwriting, while it is much easier to
imagine the PRINTED letters, like those we see in the books and
on the screen? To imagine handwriting with much minor details is
much harder task, and needs much efforts with are quite obsolete
for they make the letters more hard to read.


No one ever said that in precipitation letters you have to imagine a
handwriting style.
You materialize the Master's explanation when He writes that he imagines the
letter before.
What He wrote about was the spiritual and manasic content, not the outer
form.
The outer form is part of the execution of the imagine and this is left over
to Their chelas.
This is the reason, why these precipitated letters sometimes bear parts of
the handwriting style of the executor of Master's will.
It is quite clear that procuding an alternative physical form (typewriting)
would as less a problem for the chela as the language of the writing.

Konstantin:
It is important because you are using for its support some
information based on the authority of the Masters. They also
taught reincarnation. In this case we are left with two theories
which are quite speculative because there are almost no any
evidences for them.


The more, there are almost no evidences against reincarnation, don't?
Besides the Christian assumption that God created only one life.
Elsewehre in the NT there is the term "one life" and upon this the Catholic
Catechism creates its rationale against reincarnation.
But that is rather rhetoric than philosophy, because one life and
reincanation are no real contradictions.