Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00514)

Konstantin, thank you for correcting me.
Yes I read the book, but I am not always aware of all details.
I did not get it that he was married before probation and read the English 
text too quick.

Either Master did not look into his past and knew it not or he knew it and 
used the marriage argument as a blind for another failure.
Or he knew it and had nevertheless reasons to give him a try. Perhaps he 
continued the probation from a former life and his marriage came in between.

To know whether the Master was sincere enough needs an insight into His 
motives, which I do not have.
Frank


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Konstantin Zaitzev" <kay_ziatz@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 5:54 PM
Subject: Theos-World Are Masters sincere?


>--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" wrote:

> When and if KH knew from the beginning taht Sinnett
> will refuse to support the Phoenix project some years later

Probably you didn't understood the story. Have you read that book
on Caves & Jungles?
We cannot compare Narayan with Sinnett, for there were no
changes in Narayan's legal status during his probation; he was
married from the early childhood, and the Master should know that.
Moreover, from HPBs words it seems to follow that it was a
common practice to be married from childhood in India of that day,
so Masters probably knew how to deal with that difficulty if they
really wanted to accept Narayan otherwise they cound have no
chelas at all.

So I conclude that the real cause was a failure of Narayan as a
probationer, but Master wasn't sincere enough to announce it to
him.






Yahoo! Groups Links