Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00497)

June 24 2005


Thanks Frank and mainly agreed


Dallas
 
=======================

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Reitemeyer
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:01 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: H. Roerich claims Re: A B

Dear Dallas,

don't worry, we have much in common.

We know that no single theosophical lineage has the whole Theosophy.
Each has a part of it; the one a bigger one, the other the smaller one.

But to keep the link unbroken you'll need all parts to complete the puzzle.
That is the reason why party liners are poison for the half-dead TM.

A pukka HPB student will search and find the best, the jewels, each lineage 
has to offer.

You know that and I know that (and others).

I fully agree with your comment, I just wrote what the mass (the majority?) 
of real existing "Theosophists" in my country (at least) thinks.
They misuse the holy names of HPB's teachers - the helpers of mankind - for 
their selfish projections.

It is a shame that the most stupid superstitions could have become 
mainstream in theosophical circles (at least here), so that they are merely 
sects of bigots, hypocrites and psychics.

And I note as a little researcher that the theos. literature in Germany 
before 1945 was of a much higher quality (and quantity!) than since the last

sixty years, including translations.

A rapid degeneration by return, as if someone shifted the switch.