Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00372)

Tuesday, June 14, 2005, 3:17:22 PM, Konstantin wrote:

>> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Vladimir <forums@s...> wrote:

>> The most conspicuous contradiction between HPB et al and AAB I've
>> seen so far is given in "The Pseudo-Occultism of Mrs. A. Bailey"
>> By Alice Leighton Cleather and Basil Crump. BTW, have you seen a
>> refutation of this particular point by any of AAB's followers?

> Here are some points. There was also an article "In defence of A. 
> Bailey" in "Theosophical history", but I have lost it, and download 
> sould be paid.

> Date: Fri Feb 25, 2005 12:39 am 
> Subject: Pseudo-theosophy of Cleather & Crump 

> Well, but what do the authors recommend to do with sexual
> energy, if they do not permit nor transform it into the mental
> creative energy, neither to marry? This energy necessarily will find
> an output. Do they think that the numerous pamplets among which
> this is only one, are the best output for it?

If this is the only refutation then there is no refutation at all.
This author refutes something quite different from this contradiction:

HPB & al. : No Adept ever marries
AAB : Initiates and Masters, in many cases, marry

Any more points?


Vladimir