Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00216)

Cristina
Are you ok?

K
----- Original Message ----- 
From: christinaleestemaker 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 7:49 AM
Subject: Theos-World Real NON Theosophical = this statement of Krishtar.


Krishtar, what you write is complete NON THEOSOPHICAL = AHIMSA!

You write in your 44 years of living= how long you have studied 
THEOSOPHY? Maybe for 10 years or 14 years, that is nothing by what  
most others have done.
And while you have a wife and daughter too look for and many cats, 
how you do that? Please give me that answer, than I can learn 
something of you.And don't make others mailboxes full of your 
personal sharing things to make this whole to a circulating spinnery 
on your privat friends,which you choose for this game of you and if 
they trash,others catches that mails and make more innocent people 
victim of your games in this total mess. That is real sick.
Best whishes and have a nice Fatherday Sunday the 12th of June 2005.
ChristinaTL.



--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...> wrote:
> Anand
> In my 44 years of living I have met very intelligent and bright-
minded people very fond of Alice Bailey, a. Besant and C. W. 
Leadbeater but i sincerely do not know what happened to you.
> Either you are sick or you want to play jokes on us all.
> Although speaking of Theosophic matters you talk like an evangelic 
bishop
> If studying your authorsīs works will make me be as blind as you 
show to be I īd rather read Donald duckīs comics to death. 
> In the list you act like a terrorist, destroying our harmony and 
the healthful trade of texts of spiritual importance with your narrow-
minded and accusing e-mails.
> What are you doing here? Is it the thing you know to do?
> Have you come to Theos-talk to disturb, and accuse or to 
share,learn and teach something worth?
> Would you be happy, satisfied if all your comments could change our 
respect and love for the work of HPB?
> So why are you here?
> Seems you incarnated a hero-worship-defensor in a aparent world-war 
agaisnt Leadbeater.
> It is not so.
> You just ignore my messages, perhaps primarily set-up in the email 
server, I donīt care.
> 
> K
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Anand Gholap 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 5:19 AM
> Subject: Theos-World Re : Blavatsky's mayavic and deluding 
statement
> 
> 
> Blavatsky most probably earned this right of signing foundation 
> papers not because of merit but because of other karmic 
obligations 
> and some other reasons which I might write in future.
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel H. Caldwell" 
> <danielhcaldwell@y...> wrote:
> > Anand, WHY in heaven's name did the Mahatmas choose 
> > Blavatsky with all her smoking, meating eating,
> > bad writing??
> > 
> > WHY did the Masters use her as an instrument
> > through which they worked for many years with
> > all these bad habits?
> > 
> > WHY did the Mahatmas commission Blavatsky to
> > write ISIS UNVEILED, SECRET DOCTRINE, etc, etc.
> > when her writings would be confusing and creating
> > all the havoc you allege?
> > 
> > Couldn't they find a better agent?
> > 
> > Since Leadbeater joined the TS in 1883, etc., why
> > didn't they use him to write THE SECRET DOCTRINE??
> > 
> > Doesn't all of the above reflect badly on the Mahatmas??????
> > 
> > Goodness if you had been back there and in charge of
> > finding a suitable agent, I'm sure you could have done
> > a better job than the Mahatmas..... :)
> > 
> > Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>    
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]