HPB failure cannot be said, humans failure ,which does not understand well.
Jun 10, 2005 04:10 AM
by christinaleestemaker
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand Gholap"
<AnandGholap@A...>
> wrote:
> > Konstantin,
> > > We have more instances of dogmatizing HPB than any other writer
> >
> > I agree with many of the points you said in this mail. Here it
> should
> > be noted that after Blavatsky's death cult, sect immediately
> started
> > around Blavatsky's writing. H.S. Olcott had to make special
efforts
> > to stop that cult. So there certainly was fault in Blavatsky's
> > writing.
Not for her time, it is a question of evolution.
Many sects,spiritism were in England,Ireland and also here we have.
All using the principle HPB warned for.
Not to blame her if people don't read well or uses the knowledge in
wrong way.The same for later publishing things from as well as
Besant,Leadbeater,Krishnamurti,Steiner,and who knows what more.
> > Whereas Besant and Leadbeater are much more popular writers but
no
> > sect, cult was formed around Leadbeater and Besant. Students of
> > Leadbeater and Besant remained open minded. And this is one major
> > reason why writings of Besant and Leadbeater are far superior to
> > Blavatsky. Ultimately what matters is the effect of writing on
> > people. Students of Blavatsky became dogmatic full of hatred so
it
> is
> > Blavatsky's failure.
> >
> > Anand Gholap
> >
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
