Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00188)

If he actually backed up his statements with logic it wouldn't be a
problem. I like hearing opposing viewpoints and perspectives (you will
even see me argue for things I don't agree upon just to get more of a
story), but when I hear, "Blavatsky is bad because she smoked," all
the time, it sounds like someone's ineffectually grasping for straws.

It doesn't sound like cause for a ban though.

-Mark H.

On 6/9/05, Vladimir <forums@sova.us> wrote:
> Thursday, June 9, 2005, 7:27:26 PM, Daniel wrote:
> 
> > One subscriber on this list has repeatedly
> > told us that Blavatsky students are dogmatic,
> > close-minded fundamentalists who refuse to look
> > outside Blavatsky's writings, but as we have seen
> > on this forum that same subscriber
> > has time and time again either ignored facts,
> > evidence and documents or has made vague (sometimes
> > almost irrational) statements trying to dismiss
> > various pieces of evidence, etc.
> 
> I can see two most obvious ways to treat such an individual here:
> 
> 1. Ignore his posts altogether (mail filters are particularly good at
> it).
> 
> 2. Detach him from the list. I suppose, there is a moderator somewhere
> around here...
> 
> 
> Vladimir
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Mark Hamilton Jr.
waking.adept@gmail.com