Theos-Talk Archives (June 2005 Message tt00151)

I gess Anand expects you to present him a living eyewitness, uh?
And even if you present him such person heīll find another reason to doubt or raise up his prejudice against smoking people again or compare pejoratively HPBīs English to Francis Bacon or CWLīs.
I have increased the content of my intellectuality in these discussions with you all and Anand but we have lost precious time to discuss things more spiritual , havenīt we?
Just my imo;

Krishtar 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Daniel H. Caldwell 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:52 PM
Subject: Theos-World Anand, testimony is one kind of evidence....


Anand,

It would appear that you do NOT know what is
evidence whether considered in a legal context
or historical context or whatever.

The testimonies of witnesses as given in the
documents cited by both Jerry and Gregory
are considered to be evidence.......

Have you ever heard of "testimonial evidence"?

Historians and biographers constantly use
testimonial evidence to try to determine what really
happened in this or that historical event.

For example, see

http://blavatskyarchives.com/mastersencounterswith.htm

where I have compiled the testimonial EVIDENCE of
more than twenty witnesses who stated they had seen
the Mahatmas.

Later I will cite examples of EVIDENCE
as given in the publications mentioned by Jerry and
Gregory.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc









   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]