Theos-Talk Archives (May 2005 Message tt00575)

Pedro,
> > > > A usually religious movement or point of view characterized 
by a 
> > > > return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those 
> > > > principles, and often by intolerance of other views and 
> opposition 
> > > to secularism. 
> > > > 
> > ULT, Point Loma should criticize Blavatsky's writing in their 
> > publications. They should condemn her smoking, non-veg, short 
temper 
> > and bad English.
> 
> 
> Dear Anand,
> 
> Why should they? Have you read the following excerpts from letter 
19 
> to HSO of "Letters from the Masters of the Wisdom" (first series)? 
If 
> you have, can you tell me why was it that 

Very basic problem in your argument is you are quoting from some 
other book when you ought to observe, examine conditions created by 
Blavatskyan fundamentalists today. Instead of observing, judging, 
carefully examining conditions as exist today, you quoted from letter 
written 120 years back in very different circumstances. So first 
thing to do is, I would suggest, try to see things as they are 
without conditioned mind. If you want to know what it means to see 
things as they are, you may read some books of Krishnamurti. 


You told experience of fundamentalism in Sri Lanka and Jakarta. Then 
it becomes even more important to see that dogma and fundamentalism 
are not formed in the TS. 

Anand Gholap