Theos-Talk Archives (May 2005 Message tt00534)

Anand
I have had quite a little time to read all these good emails that get into my computer, quite a few minutes a day to answer any of them, unfortunately,
But i wanted you to know that If you expect everybody to find the good in your prefered authors, whom we all know, shouldnīt you do the same?
Yes, friend, your attacking to HPBīs manners will not make us enjoy and have a major interest in CWL or other writers you praise.
If you sometimes get chocked on our reactions, I think you should contribute with positive thoughts and comments not with this kind of narrow-minded and evangelic-shepherd-like statements.
No one should condemm anyone for what they did, except divine justice ( karma), but we must cull the good in all philosophic and metaphysical systems avaiable, not condemn Blavatsky habits of smoking or food preferences.
Isīnt it childish ?
You criticize fundamentalism but what do you offer us better than these controversial and provoking ideas and statements?
Anand, donīt accept this message as a aggression, it is not my aim.
I am sure that if I were still a member of your "anand gholap.net" group and if I were spreading controversial and negative comments on CWL, AB, GH, and others you would not feel comfortable.

Krishtar



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Anand Gholap 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 12:14 AM
Subject: Theos-World Re:Those who study Blavatsky's writing become fundamentalists



> > A usually religious movement or point of view characterized by a 
> > return to fundamental principles, by rigid adherence to those 
> > principles, and often by intolerance of other views and opposition 
> to secularism. 
> > 
ULT, Point Loma should criticize Blavatsky's writing in their 
publications. They should condemn her smoking, non-veg, short temper 
and bad English.




   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]