Re: Theos-World Re: Should an "ideal" Theosophical Society study and "promote" all these books?
May 16, 2005 02:50 PM
by Mark Hamilton Jr.
Theosophy promotes a person's ability to think for themselves, if
applied properly. Sometimes with future predictions such as those it's
hard to use common sense to filter out all the erroneous information.
It passes right over our heads and we end up writing it in stone, so
to speak. The task handed down to us is to ignore everything that
seems incredulous, and find more solid truths. We'll get it sooner or
later -- and it will lead us into a more mature spiritual age.
-Mark H.
On 5/16/05, Konstantin Zaitzev <kay_ziatz@yahoo.com> wrote:
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@a... wrote:
>
> >>> In theosophy_@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@a... wrote:
>
> > purpose is to "spread broadcast the original teachings
> > of theosophy," as laid down by Blavatsky and Judge
>
> Strictly speaking we cannot regard books by Judge as a "source"
> teaching. They are rather an interpretation of HPB teaching with
> all flaws which may by characteristic for other interpreters
> mentioned.
> For example, in "Ocean of theosophy" he questions the growth of
> world population which is now the obvious fact for everyone. Moreover,
> he makes a conclusion that because Chinese are 4th race people they
> are dying out, while now we see quite the reverse. Such statements,
> being obviously erroneous, create bad publicity for theosophy,
> probably even more than claimings about life on Mars, and if we regard
> them as "original teachings of theosophy" it would mean that theosophy
> in its core contains such a nonsense.
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mark Hamilton Jr.
waking.adept@gmail.com
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application