Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01900)

Dear Ramadoss

We can learn a lot about human nature observing how things are.
Anand for example is our daily example, always showing his ignorance on theworks of his neo-theosophical idolsīs predecessors.
It saddens me, because I started Theosophy on CWLīs books and later I gotacquainted to HPBīs books, as well AP Sinnettīs MLīs and I used to respect a lot his books as well as Besantīs, but what has really saddened me is the lack of consideration on Adyar headquartersī philosophy from that time up to now!
Little I know about the Adyar history and all its implications, but nothingcan, IMO, be a strong reason and justify to act this way.
We criticize Olcott a lot because his lack of consideration, his childish manners, his indiscretions, his volubility, but we have daily examples of it!!!
Daily examples!!! No need for going back in time.

Krishtar
- annoyed-


MKR wote:

Here are the books listed as "Books of Interest" in the TS(Adyar) website. 
One notices the absence of either SD or Isis. Is it accidental or 
intentional? Where would theosophy and TS be today without these two 
monumental works for which HPB sacrificed her life?
( list from ADYAR is omitted )

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]