Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01413)

Apl 21 2005

Dear Friends:

I fully agree with this description:

"Unity or "Brotherhood" 

does not condone the acceptance of information which is deceitful,
dishonest, manipulative, condescending, domineering or demonstrably untrue.

No amount of eloquent articulation combined with otherwise worthwhile 
pleas for tolerance and acceptance can hide the utter hypocrisy of the
position."


Why waste the energy ?


Thank you: N H Careyta.


Dallas

=================================


-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of nhcareyta
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 9:16 PM
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Theos-World Re: 'Harmony of teachers teachings and interpreters'



Dear Perry

Indeed an interesting article. Unfortunately lack of time precludes a 
comprehensive analysis. 
>From my perspective, the article arises from yet another apologist 
position attempting to defend the indefensible. Unity 
or "Brotherhood" does not condone the acceptance of information which 
is deceitful, dishonest, manipulative, condescending, domineering or 
demonstrably untrue.
No amount of eloquent articulation combined with otherwise worthwhile 
pleas for tolerance and acceptance can hide the utter hypocrisy of 
the position.

Very best wishes

Nigel

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Perry Coles" <perrycoles@y...> 
wrote:
> 
> Interesting article from Edi Bilimoria in the 
> Theosophist June 2003 page 327
> 
> http://www.ts-adyar.org/magazines.html
> 
> Entitled : Harmony of teachers teachings and interpreters 
> I'd be interested to hear what others may think of this article.
> 
> Perry






Yahoo! Groups Links