Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01231)

Iain-

Please stop this! You aren't sitting at my computer
reading post after post telling me I'm deluded, here
read this 5 million page treatise from the
Theosophical vaults! I never start conflicts, I only
respond to them. And thank you for giving me so much
power to say I've brought, single-handedly, strife to
the group. If you really need a scapegoat, ask me
first if I want to be one, don't elect me outright!

Gee, what does a scapegoat wear to the market? Hmmm...

By the way, you've just fallen into my trap! When I
posted what you just replied to, it was designed to
trap guilty hearts...and both you and Krishtar have
fallen in...anybody with a clean conscience wouldn't
even feel a need to respond...

Now, shoo!

Niki


--- Iain <ibse03888@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

> 
> Niki,A lot of people opened to you and in return
> you have given abuse and 
> insult.You have brought disharmony here,Yes we all
> feel sorry for you, yes 
> sorry, but it does look like that you are looking
> for aggravation, is this a 
> frustration display? possibly or is it just
> attention seeking? very likely. 
> What a hard life you have had, ..or have you? some
> of your statements seem 
> to be a bit Mills and Boon ,Perhaps your jealous of
> others that can cope 
> with what life has to offer. Many of the people have
> a harder life than you. 
> Are you looking for an emotional crutch, a patsy
> that will fall in with your 
> faultless ways so that you can carry on in whatever
> manner you think you 
> should. Sorry kid, perhaps its time for you to grow
> up.
> cheers Iain
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Niki Durand" <nikidurand@yahoo.com>
> To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 10:00 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World It's not like I forget,
> 
> 
> >
> > Look Krishtar-
> >
> > We can make this our last post together, after
> your
> > obvious rebuttal, 'cos I'm onto you.
> >
> > I placed a post, in public, and asked nothing,
> other
> > than an open mind. I've been mat with mostly
> dogma,
> > and now you've joined in that. You came to me with
> > bias, as if you actually knew something about my
> > experiences, and managed to be demeaning along the
> > way. When I called you on it, very fairly I feel,
> I
> > get this petulant reply below. If you were as
> > objective and compassionate as you feel, then you
> > would've realized I still have a great deal of
> pain.
> > You write from a place of negative male energy,
> which
> > always wants to be right at all costs. Someone's
> grief
> > means nothing to people like you if being right
> looms
> > on the horizon. Well, K. I have tyre tracks on my
> back
> > from your rush to claim another bon-bon for your
> ego
> > basket.
> >
> > I hope you NEVER have to suffer the sudden loss of
> > your mate. Maybe then you'll have an inkling of
> what
> > I'm going through. I'm sharing intimate thoughts
> > freely...but go ahead and feel free to continue
> > pissing on them to satisfy your desire to be
> right.
> >
> > By the way, did you notice I didn't sign my usual
> > "love" on the post you responded to? That's
> because I
> > was being sacastic...and it ws intended for anyone
> who
> > felt guilty- like you! You just fell for my trap,
> and
> > now I know where you stand...ooops! don't look
> down,
> > that's spiritual dog-poo yer standing in...
> >
> > Niki
> >
> > ps...like with anyone else I've ever had a
> conflict
> > with I'm willing to come to peace, if you are. But
> I
> > won't ever be talked down to, not even by God...
> >
> >
> > --- krishtar <krishtar_a@brturbo.com.br> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Niki,
> >> You always used the word "love" in your e-.mails.
> >> You asked respect for your feelings towards
> someone
> >> you love.
> >> You ask people to respect your and share your
> >> experiences and have empathy for the sorrow you
> >> mentioned by the living of your "soulmate".
> >>
> >> Here I put a question for your reflection and
> >> consideration.
> >> The same empathy and consideration you plea you
> >> should offer to all of us, here.
> >> It is a list of theosophy, of people who try to
> >> study theosophy.
> >> One of the principal characteristics of this
> study
> >> is impartiality, objectiveness.
> >> Here we are not attached to the study and
> researches
> >> on siddhis, which are empty in their essence and
> for
> >> many times lead us to illusion.
> >> Theosophy is not spiritism, perhaps you are
> >> confounding theosophy with spiritism of Allan
> >> Kardec- line where they explain and believe in
> the
> >> phenomena as they are, neglecting their ultimate
> >> causesand the mechanisms that produce them.
> >> Judging according what you are looking for,
> you´d
> >> better, IMHO, look for another thread of
> thinking,
> >> maybe in the line of spiritism, where such
> >> experiences have different aproaches.
> >> It´s just my opinion.
> >>
> >> Krishtar
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- 
> >> From: Niki Durand
> >> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com ; AA-BNStudy
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 12:37 PM
> >> Subject: RE: Theos-World It's not like I
> forget,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yeah, delusions are sad, aren't they...good
> thing
> >> none
> >> of us here suffer from that, huh? What a lovely
> >> group
> >> of experienced experts, all versed through vast
> >> experience in what it means to be in vibrant
> >> contact
> >> with spirits and other beings. Whew! Glad I'm
> >> amongst
> >> peers who have as much experience as I do and
> >> never
> >> resort to quoting scripture without ever had
> any
> >> paranormal experiences themselves and who know
> to
> >> trust another's accounts of their own
> >> experiences...no
> >> browbeating here, oh no...lucky me...
> >>
> >> Niki
> >>
> >>
> >> --- "W.Dallas TenBroeck"
> <dalval14@earthlink.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Apl 19 2005
> >> >
> >> > Dear T and Friends:
> >> >
> >> > This may supply a part of the answer:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > DELUSIONS OF CLAIRVOYANCE
> >> >
> >> > SOME years ago it was proposed that
> psychometry
> >> > should be used in detecting
> >> > crime and for the exposing of motive in all
> >> > transactions between man and
> >> > man.
> >> >
> >> > This, the alleged discoverer said, would
> alter
> >> the
> >> > state of society by
> >> > compelling people to be honest and by
> reducing
> >> > crime.
> >> >
> >> > Now for those who do not know, it may be well
> to
> >> say
> >> > that when you
> >> > psychometrize you take any object that has
> been
> >> in
> >> > the immediate vicinity of
> 
=== message truncated ===



__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Make Yahoo! your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs