Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01229)

This is the last time I will respond to an instigative post of yours.

> No, you're not obsessed AND THAT"S WHY THAT"S ALL YOU AND NIKI
> WANNA TALK ABOUT EXCEPT -what- oh drats that's right
> badmouthing people
> for not thinking for themselves -
I have given my two cents on many other topics. My introduction topic
stopped a while ago, and I haven't brought it up since then. The only
reason why my original topic turned into a 50 message thread in just a
few days is mainly because you kept asking me to clarify details. So
to say I talk about nothing else doesn't make sense.

I've even kept my cool through all the sarcastic criticism and never
insulted anyone on the list. To say I was badmouthing people is
unjustified. If I'm mistaken, go ahead and quote me.

Also, if you want to back up any of your other claims feel free. But I
don't wish to contribute any more to this off-topic argumentative
drivel.

-Mark H.


On 4/19/05, thalprin <thalprin@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> No, you're not obsessed AND THAT"S WHY THAT"S ALL YOU AND NIKI WANNA
> TALK ABOUT EXCEPT -what- oh drats that's right, badmouthing people
> for not thinking for themselves -
> 
> Oh, please, at least ifn you've gotta lie/pretend can't you be more
> imaginative.
> 
> So, now I'm hypocritical for questioning a/o disagreeing with you
> which -what- skewed your details - "Oh, my"!
> 
> Yes, you are blindsided. But that's ok, you can get some glasses,
> or not.
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Hamilton Jr."
> <waking.adept@g...> wrote:
> > Actually I've not been obsessed about it; you asked me to clarify
> > about my story and I did. It seems hypocritical you would skew my
> > details and then suggest that I'm being blindsighted.
> >
> > -Mark H.
> >
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Mark Hamilton Jr.
waking.adept@gmail.com