Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt01079)

Writing about Madame Blavatsky, Anand comments:

"...she was a chain smoker. Other things are too
horrible to tell."

TOO HORRIBLE to tell???

Again pointing to Madame Blavatsky, Anand
comments:

"Why would I live with somebody who eats flesh,
smokes to name a few habits."

But Master Koot Hoomi was NOT
so "put off" by Madame Blavatsky.

Even C.W. Leadbeater writes about "the exceedingly
close relation in which she [Blavatsky]
stood with Him [Koot Hoomi] , so that whatever
was within her consciousness was
also within His when He wished it."

Yet apparently Anand would not want to be
even in the same room with Madame Blavatsky....!!

Anand has professed reverence to the Masters
yet is he "denigrating" Madame Blavatsky?

I guess Anand has forgotten what he wrote not
long ago on this forum. Anand stated:

"Disciples and Master are one to considerable extent.
Anything you do to a disciple is indirectly doing to
the Master himself."

If this last comment by Anand is true, and if Anand has "denigrated" 
Blavatsky, has he also denigrated the Master?

Food for thought.

Daniel