Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt00667)

Khrishtar,
I answered Daniel's questions long back. After lot of debate he 
accepts some part of answers. But problem is after eight or fifteen 
days he again asks same questions. So I can't waste time in 
explaining same thing every week. 
Apart from that these things are not as simple as Daniel and many 
members think. Why Masters say certain thing can not be understood 
unless one has great wisdom. Daniel and most other members take 
literal meaning of Masters' every sentence. Literal meaning and 
actual meaning are not always same. In case of Leadbeater and Besant, 
literal meaning and actual meaning are generally same. So they are 
more suitable for ordinary reader.

Anand Gholap 

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...> wrote:
> Anand
> It is also very immoral the way you neglect all the answers you are 
still owing Daniel and others.
> Do you just delete them because they cannot get a proper answer 
from you ?
> I hope you read the many messages Daniel sends you that not only 
show that he has a basis on the writings of KH and Master M. but also 
prove you that it is totally unfounded your accusations.
> Or do you also doubt these masters ?
> 
> Krishtar
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Anand Gholap 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2005 4:08 PM
> Subject: Theos-World Re:Blavatsky ate flesh of animals regularly
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Bart Lidofsky <bartl@s...> 
wrote:
> > Anand Gholap wrote:
> > > Nothing can justify eating flesh of innocent animals. 
> > 
> > So, how many people should die to save the life of one animal?
> > 
> > Bart
> 
> Laws of morality depend on stage of evolution. For men, they must 
> always avoid cruelty. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]