Re: Theos-World Re: Leadbeater is a King of All Occultists
Apr 08, 2005 04:19 PM
by Jerry Hejka-Ekins
Anand,
Perhaps, the best way to, at least, partially answer your question is
from an historical perspective. When Krishnamurti closed the Order of
the Star and left the Theosophical Society (1930), the leadership was,
for a time left "flat footed" so to speak. Jinarajadasa's comments in
the ES material published at that time is quite revealing. CJ was quite
incredulous that after pretty much growing up with K. and with Nitya and
George Arundale forming sort of an inner group under CWL, Krishnamurti
was throwing all of that aside. K's early public talks after leaving
the TS were very discounting of the Teachings and of the Masters.
When George Arundale became President in 1934, he took the tack of
ignoring Krishnamurti and tried to put the TS on a different tract.
Basically Arundale took the public stand that Theosophy is everything
and anything that the public wanted it to be. If the public was
interested in the arts, he made the arts Theosophy. If they were
interested in politics, he made politics Theosophy. It was a very busy
time of printing tens of thousands of pamphlets and flyers all devoid of
meningful content. It was also the beginning of the editing of
Theosophical texts so as to remove references to K. and others
embarrassments to the TS. While all of this reforming Theosophy for
the public was going on, the ES was still very strong and maintained
their own traditions. So, there became two Theosophies. One for the
public, and one for the insiders. In other words, for the public,
Theosophy was anything they wanted it to be. The problem is that when
Theosophy became everything, it did not escape the attention of most
enquirers that Theosophy is then--nothing. By the time Arundale died in
1945, the membership of the TS had fallen to the lowest level, and has
never really recovered.
When I joined TSA in 1963, Theosophy was not a popular subject. The TS
members were all very elderly, and the Lodges were filled with Victorian
furniture. Most of the members who were the active workers 20s and 30s
were still alive and made up most of the membership. I remember
Catherine Mays, Dora and Fritz Kunz, the Layton's etc. Everyone was
excited when I joined because I was "fresh blood" as they said. But I
was also of a very different generation than theirs. I would knock them
off balance by asking probing questions, challenged the status quo. I
saw nothing wrong with modern music and modern culture, while on the
other hand, members believed that Jazz was created by Black Magicians.
You could imagine what they though of Rock n Roll. As the 60's
progressed into the psychedelic age, with hippies, Tim Leary, Alan
Watts, and the Beatles, more people closer to my age began to drift into
TS, but the TSA leadership did not know how to deal with them.
I remember those early Lodge lectures. Old timers would give talks
throwing out phrases like "the inner government of the world" and "the
path to the Masters" and "the Great White Brotherhood" but they were
singing to the choir. They did not bother to explain to newbys what
they were talking about. There was no viable educational program then.
By the late 60's Headquarters responded by devising a series of monthly
letters for new members. By that time, I already was well into my own
reading and consequently found their letters, like their pamphlets
rather devoid of meaningful content.
When Dora Kunz became President in the late 70s she began to initiate a
policy to built up the Lodges and broke a long standing tradition by
inviting young members who were talented but not ES members to volunteer
to work at Olcott. The membership under her approached to nearly 8,000
at one point. When she left in 1986, the new management began to
dismantle and undermine everything she accomplished. The new tactic was
centralization. There was a lot of in-fighting and some nasty
marginalization of some active members who did not agree with the new
program. A lot of people left the TS in disgust, and at the same time,
members from the Arundale days were passing away. When John Algeo
became President, TSA membership dropped to under 4,000 at one
point--about 1/2 of the maximum membership under Dora Kunz.
So, what you have now in TSA is a general public, most of whom do not
belong to a Lodge and do not have the support of a study group for the
study of Theosophy. The classic texts are available, but they are in
an edited form. For those interested in history, there is a "party
line" history that is taught, but it is not very comprehensive--and very
misleading. While TSA is beginning to promote Study Courses, what they
teach is a very sanitized version of Theosophy. It is what they want
the members to know, and nothing more.
This is not a complete answer, but I hope it gives you a direction.
Perhaps, in future discussions, we can develop some of the themes which
I only hinted at here.
Best
Jerry
Anand Gholap wrote:
Jerry,
What could be the reasons according to you for members not having
much knowledge of Theosophy?
Anand Gholap
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Jerry Hejka-Ekins <jjhe@c...>
wrote:
Anand,
He we agree. I also believed that books should be reprinted as
they
were left by the authors. I would not even bother to change the
English
spellings. However, I don't have any occult reasons for this
opinion.
I simply believe that authors ought to be allowed to stand or fall
based
upon what they actually wrote. I have to hand it to ULT for
being the
only Theosophical organization which reprinted Blavatsky's and
Judge's
writing in their original form, while other organizations were
changing
them or allowing them to go out of print. Of course, ULT did not
reprint Besant and Leadbeater's writings, but that would have been
outside of their mission statement to have done so.
There was an excellent article done a few years ago by Gregory
Tillett
for the Theosophical History journal which reviewed the changes the
Adyar TS had made in Besant's and Leadbeater's books over the
years.
The article was reprinted in the ACT newsletter. It would be nice
if
Drs Tillett and Santucci would permit this article to be put
online. I
think it is a very important article, because, people who buy
current
editions of their books are rarely aware that they have been edited
in
any significant way.
Jerry
Anand Gholap wrote:
Jerry,
As you see, I did not say that this material *contains* writings
of AB
and CWL, but is based upon their ideas and uses their terminology.
My opinion on this is books should be printed exactly as they
originally appeared without abridgement. For printing largest
edition
of the book should be taken. e.g. Masters and the Path was
enlarged by
Mr. Leadbeater himself and so for printing this largest edition
should
be taken. Only spelling may be changed to suit current US English.
e.g. realisation (old British) would become realization. I am
totally
against making more changes.
For making study course also original books of Annie Besant and
Leadbeater, written in their own language, should be recommended.
Not
only English of AB and CWL is among the best even by today's
standard
but there are occult reasons for recommending their original
writing.
Anand Gholap
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
