One of Paul Johnson's Arguments About Olcott's Testimony on the Masters
Apr 07, 2005 10:17 AM
by Daniel H. Caldwell
Paul Johnson wrote:
"It is far more feasible to follow known people
making documented journeys to known locations by
known means than to follow unknown persons making
undocumented journeys by unknown means which are
allegedly miraculous in some cases."
Johnson's argument here is fallacious and the
two categories of evidence he poses are artificial
and really don't hold up to close scrutiny.
For more details, see:
http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm#II
Daniel
Blavatsky Study Center
http://blavatskystudycenter.org
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
