Theos-Talk Archives (April 2005 Message tt00109)

Daniel
Maybe it is another opportunity for us to use compassion and keep trading opinions, maybe he doesnŽt want to analyse and feel more comfortable with the explanations given by his preferred occultists.
But who knows if in the future heŽll not take a closer look in mor reliable works?
The good in all of that is that we also learn when we go back to the books and archives and revisit our comparisons.
Thus the newcomers in our group may find many useful threads for re-discussion.
Regards
K


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Daniel H. Caldwell 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:18 PM
Subject: Theos-World "...the diffiulty that Gollap finds...."




Krishtar,

You wrote:

"Something I cannot understand is the diffiulty 
that Gollap finds in these teachings direct from 
the masters, he still insists in LeadbeaterŽs
spiritist-fashioned explanations."

Yes, this puzzles me, too.  

Here is Anand's chance to show the readers
on this forum his understanding which
somehow apparently reconciles such
contradictions.

But I'm afraid Anand does not want to share his
thoughts with us.  

But at least other readers can see
the comparisons and contrasts. That is
all we can hope for.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc










   
Yahoo! Groups Links



   





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]