Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00710)

I'm speculating that sense and truths 
and reality might be seen (in some 
cases, if not very generally ...) as 
having a relational/interpretive aspect 
or "apparent basis" per whatever 
"karmic/interpretive influence/tendency" 
("selective" quotes per interpretive 
variability), so that one person's 
sense, truth or reality could be 
another's whatever, basically, or "in a 
sense"... (except maybe where more 
stability might be somewhat generally 
desired by way of "broader terms" as per 
worldviews, eg, where "sense making" 
and "mutual agreements" might be seen to 
"facilitate coping" in terms of "life in 
general" ...).

Speculatively,
Mauri

PS in keeping with my attempts to turn 
over a newer leaf, I first wrote the 
preceding with no quotes in it at all, 
but then, while rereading that paragraph 
my "sense making" ("apparently"...) sort 
of suggested I put them in there as a 
way of attempting to suggest (at least 
"selectively") something or other about 
what I tend to see ("apparently"...) as 
a kind of "basically interpretive nature 
of things in general," but where "some 
things" might be "selected" or 
interpreted as having a "too obviously 
interpretive/Mayavic aspect in terms 
of r/Reality," and so might be "better 
off" in quotes, at least ... or "at 
least," no matter how oddly "selective" 
they might appear to be. Alternatively, 
I guess I could put everything in 
quotes (short of using no quotes at all, 
like they might do in Tibet, apparently 
...), but then I really don't see how I 
could attempt to be "more specific" that 
way about "intended meaning re 
'keyishness of interpretive aspects'" in 
certain kinds of contexts (as "per 
Theosophical modeling," eg ...). Not 
convinced? How about the use of quotes 
as reminders to "read between some 
lines," maybe (if "exoteric versions" 
are not seen to be in short supply 
during one's Theosophical studies 
...)... ?