Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00588)

The question is... "Be" what? Also, what does "esoterics" mean in the 
context you use it -- or in any context? 

In a message dated 03/24/05 9:34:57 AM, mhart@idirect.ca writes:

>All the "more reason" to "just be," eh 
>... (quotes per esoterics).
>
>Speculatively,
>Mauri
>
>PS To me, the word "esoterics" 
>generally seems esoteric enough just by 
>itself, without quotes. Not that there 
>might not exceptions, maybe ...
>
>
>samblo@cs.com wrote:
>> Vladimir and Cass,
>> Well, Blavatsky did write an article about the White and the Dark that 
are 
>> in perpetual struggle throughout the manvantaric manisfestation. I don't
>> recal the name of the article right now, perhaps Daniel or another 
archivist
>> might locate it. In one of the Mahatma Letters it is stated that they 
themsleves
>> are restrained in their intervention and assistance to us as each time 
they do 
>> so it changes the balance of energy between the White and The Dark and
>> the Dark then has right to equally balance the energy change with it's own 
>> compensation and action. I have the URL but it is on my old computerand 
not 
>> here on the XP. the strata ofthis contest is way beyond the consciousness 
of man.
>> John
>