Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00516)

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, leonmaurer@a... wrote:
> 
> In a message dated 03/21/05 5:24:48 AM, AnandGholap@A... writes:
> >
> >Almost everybody who worked with Blavatsky either criticized her 
or 
> >left her. 
> >
> >--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, MKR<ramadoss@g...> wrote:
> 
> >> Who was that?
> >> 
> >
> >> At 06:32 PM 03/20/05 +0000, Anand Gholap wrote:
> >
> >> >This is what a senior disciple said.
> 
> Enuff is enuff...
> 
> Now that you have NOT answered that question -- with the same 
opinionated, 
> unreasoned, unverified, gossipy, childishly petulant and 
slanderously 
> implicative remarks that denigrates all the Masters and their 
chosen Chela, HPB, the 
> *proven* "Adept" who gave us the theosophical truths that most 
correctly 
> "synthesizes science, religion and philosophy" -- just as you have 
avoided, in a 
> similarly duplicitous manner, answering all the previous questions 
asked you by 
> Daniel and others... And, since you have also denied these 
teachings -- as an 
> "exact" science of Gupta Vidya handed down by all the ancient 
Chohans and Masters 
> (and given out clearly by them in the SD) -- by flooding us with 
the spurious 
> quotes of later self serving interpreters, who tried, after HPB was 
unable to 
> respond, to mystify and distort the fundamental theosophical 
truths, so as to 
> promote a new, messianic led, organized hierarchical religion that 
is in 
> direct contradiction of those Master's teachings ... We wonder how 
much deeper you 
> are going to put your foot in your mouth and further destroy 
whatever 
> credibility you might have had as a self professed student/teacher 
of theosophy (and 
> its occult metaphysics) in its pure, unadulterated form?

Dear Leon and all, 
Mr Gholap's reverential support for many of Bishop Leadbeater's now 
utterly discredited notions and his apparent dismissal of H P 
Blavatsky, many of whose notions have subsequently been verified and 
validated by modern science, deeply mystifies and antagonises a 
number of contributors to theos-talk.
Mr Gholap seems to hold that freedom of thought permits any opinion 
whatsoever in the name of theosophy. 
In my experience, this position is unfortunately supported 
unequivocally by the elected hierarchy in most sections of the Adyar 
Theosophical Society. In an attempt to prevent any form of dogma, 
this Society permits and encourages through publication and 
presentations, the perpetuation of absolutely unsustainable 
propositions under the heading of Theosophy.
Perhaps it is from this organisation's position that Mr Gholap and 
others gain their inspiration and support?
Regards
Nigel