Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00441)

Note: In all of the 225 places that this
letter was mailed to, I have
leonmaurer@aol.com as the "Reply To" address,
but it is automatically cut away in the few
Yahoo! Groups that are on the list, such as
this one.--John.
----------------------

Dear fellow Theosophists:

This "Open Letter" is about "Leon Maurer", a
very wise, skilled, and knowledgeable
scientist and theosophist.

It has been sent to 225 e-mail addresses
(which are alphabetically listed below). I
have tried hard to reach all (or at least as
many as I could) of the different
organizations within our worldwide
Theosophical Movement, and in as many nations
as possible. The 225 addresses are to many
theosophical organizations, theosophical web
sites (both organizational and individual),
theosophical networks, affiliates,
departments, publishers, magazines, journals,
other publications, department heads,
leaders, webmasters, and theosophical forums
around the whole world.

My reason for writing to our entire Movement
is this: If theosophy, as HPB said, will make
its biggest headway through science, why do I
never see or hear anything within our
movement about Leon Maurer, a highly skilled
scientist and theosophist, who has posted
many hundreds of letters in various
theosophical forums, as well as many more to
scientific people and forums outside of our
Movement for many years now?

To everyone that I have mailed this to: Does
he or does he not, based on his views (once
you learn about them if you don't already
know what they are), deserve to be featured,
written about, and interviewed by all
theosophical organizations and publications?
To those who know nothing of him, I have
attached one of his letters below this one
(after the list of all the e-mail addresses
within our theosophical movement that I sent
this letter to). I do this so that if his
work is as important as I personally think it
is, and many in our Movement also decide that
he actually knows what he is talking about,
and in a way that scientists can understand,
our Movement can take advantage of his work
and put it to use before he dies and moves
on, since he is about 80 years old. At least
I want everyone to know about him and his
work in case it is important. OK, that's my
reason.

Please only contact him, and each other, not
me. This letter to everyone is my only
contribution to this and whatever may follow.
Please know that Lenny didn't know that I did
this, and neither did anyone else -- but I
have been thinking about it for some time
now. I will simply be happy to read about
whatever happens, good, bad, or otherwise,
once it gets to the various theosophical
forums that I'm a member of.

Please forward this to any e-mail addresses
of organizations, publications, and people
whom you know (that you think should know
about it) that are not on the below
alphabetical list that I gathered from
various places before I began sending this
letter to them.

An important reminder note: Just scroll past
the 225 addresses that are found below in
order to read the particular letter by Leon
Maurer that I have attached to this one.

Finally: I most sincerely hope that, in the
final analysis, many people and organizations
in our Movement will want to contact and
work closely with him in such areas as
publishing, movie making, and so on, as he
talks about -- and in a "United" way, that I
think HPB and the adepts would want to happen
in this particular scientific case.

Yours truly in Universal Brotherhood,

John DeSantis
(Compiler)
http://www.wisdomworld.org
http://www.wisdomworld.org/setting.html
http://www.wisdomworld.org/additional/index.html

-----------------------------------
http://www.PublicAndPrivateEnterprise.org
=================

agngaase@frisurf.no
agngaase@online.no
alcyone@satyam.net.in
amerman@theosophy.net
AmSec@pacbell.net
aquarian@skyinet.net
archives@theosmail.net
armin.zebrowski@t-online.de
aspasia@theosophy.gr
av@theosmail.net
azar1@cyber.net.pk
azra1@cyber.net.pk
bemapo03@hotmail.com
Blavatsky_Study@yahoogroups.com
Blavatsky_Study-owner@yahoogroups.com
bomult@vsnl.com
campbell@austheos.org.au
carson@blavatsky.net
chairman@panafrican-theos.org
cprdunn@nbnet.co.ke

---20---

customerservice@wisdomtraditions.com
danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com
derickson@tsl.org
director@roerich.org
dmcgrath@eircom.net
dmcgrath1@eircom.net
dougherty@theosociety.org
dp5@compuserve.com
dubal@aml.udsm.ac.tz
ed@austheos.org.au
edcoord@austheos.org.au
editionsadyar@wanadoo.fr
editorateosofica@editorateosofica.com.br
Editors@theosophycompany.org
education@theosmail.net
edwin@iprolink.ch
elisenamartinez@hotmail.com
email@ultdc.org
enquirers@theosophical.ca
epelleti@telus.net

---40---

esotericcosmology@yahoogroups.com
esotericcosmology-owner@yahoogroups.com
et-prent@ping.at
events@wisdomtraditions.com
ewb@vsnl.com
fcormayorga@hotmail.com
fieldwork@theosmail.net
fohat@planet.eon.net
gburgos@zone0.org
geneva@lucistrust.org
ginc@templeofthepeople.org
glanders@ix.netcom.com
hct@theosophy.com
help@theosophycanada.com
hpblibrary@theosophical.ca
hpbwqjudge@hotmail.com
hq@theosophy.org.nz
hugooost@telkomsa.net
icak@dnet.net.id
indopres@austheos.org.au

---60---

indopress@austheos.org.au
info@agniyoga.org
info@brockwood.org.uk
info@ConcordGrovePress.org
info@itc-naarden.org
info@krotonaschool.org
info@singaporelodge.org
info@theosofie.nl
info@theosophical.ca
info@theosophicalsociety.gr
info@theosophical-society.org.uk
info@theosophysandiego.org
ingmardb@zonnet.nl
inquiry@adyar.com.au
inquiry@blavatskyfoundation.org
inquiry@saintgermainfoundation.org
inquiry@theosophycompany.org
intl.hq@ts-adyar.org
Irena.PK@email.si
iswaragarden@centurytel.net

---80---

jacmel.theosophic@caramail.com
jacmel.theosophie@caramail.com
jc2003jp@land.linkclub.or.jp
jjhe@charter.net
jmillman@tsl.org
jsantucci@fullerton.edu
J.TARRAGO@terra.cs
J.TARRAGO@terra.es
juliaballesteros@hotmail.com
katinka_hesselink@yahoo.com
kcentrevns@satyam.net.in
kfiblr@blr.vsnl.net.in
kimdiei_ts@magic.fr
kimdieu_ts@magic.fr
kindjala@lg.com.br
librarian@theosophy.org
library@theosmail.net
loli@netspace.net.au
london@lucistrust.org
lutparis@worldnet.fr

---100---

mail@easterntradition.org
mail@theosophia.co.il
mail@theosophic-adyar.de
mail@theosophie-adyar.de
manager@questbookshop.com
Martin@euser.fol.nl
martinlowe@blueyonder.co.uk
natlodge@theosmail.net
natsec@theosmail.net
newyork@lucistrust.org
obed@pwcbd.com
office@oakgroveschool.com
olcott@theosmail.net
opt-mas@slingshot.co.nz
orlichsm@yahoo.com
para.vidya@gems.vsnl.net.in
PETELIE@mufnet.zccm.zm
phillip@esotericastrologer.org
phxultlodge@hotmail.com
pm_kouahoh@hotmail.com

---120---

pres@austheos.org.au
president@theosophical.ca
presidents@tsl.org
prezsec@theosmail.net
programs@theosmail.net
Publishers@theosophycompany.org
questeditor@theosmail.net
questmag@theosmail.net
questoperations@theosmail.net
questpublicity@theosmail.net
questshop@theosmail.net
redaktionen@teosofiskakompaniet.net
review@theosophy.com
ronaksampat@hotmail.com
rrdon27@earthlink.net
sahyadrischool@freeyellow.com
sakti@sapo.pt
samadhi@internet.com.uy
schuller@alpheus.org
sekretariat@goetheanum.ch

---140---

shakti@sao.PT
sociedadteosofica@entelchile.net
starg@arnet.com.ar
starge@infovia.com.ar
stargentina@sociedad-teosofica.com.ar
sti@telemar.it
study@blavatsky.net
support@theosophical-society.org.uk
susan@kaschula.co.za
teocuba@yahoo.com
teosam@glocalnet.net
teosam@goteborg.utfors.se
teosamf@teosofiskasamfundet.a.se
teosofia@stb.org.br
teosoficacolumbiana@hotmail.com
teosoficaperu@hotmail.com
teosofinen.seura@jippii.fi
tgpas@circle.net
theophil@info.com.ph
theos357@aol.com

---160---

theosacademy@iinet.net.au
theos-l@list.vnet.net
theoslodges@yahoogroups.com
theoslodges-owner@yahoogroups.com
theosnw@theosophy-nw.org
theosofie@skynet.be
theosophia@yahoogroups.com
theosophia-owner@yahoogroups.com
Theosophical@yahoogroups.com
Theosophical-owner@yahoogroups.com
theosophicalgr@hotmail.com
theosophie@theosophie.asso.fr
theosophie@worldnet.fr
theosophist@eth.net
theosophy@nethere.com
theosophy@usa.com
theosophy@yahoogroups.com
theosophy-owner@yahoogroups.com
theosophy_@yahoogroups.com
theosophy_-owner@yahoogroups.com

---180---

theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
theos-talk-owner@yahoogroups.com
theosophy_talks_truth@yahoogroups.com
theosophy_talks_truth-owner@yahoogroups.com
theosophy_vns@yahoo.com
theos.soc@gems.vsnl.net.in
theossoc@satyam.net.in
theos-world-owner@yahoogroups.com
thosgdavis@icon.co.za
tomtom@3i.co.za
toy77@aol.com
tphindia@vsnl.com
ts@gudspekifelagid.is
tshq@austheos.org.au
tshutau7@hu.inter.net
tslibrary@theosociety.org
ts.pasadena@eclipse.co.uk
tspeace@info.com.ph
tspeace@mnl.sequel.net
tstec@theosociety.org

---200---

ts-treasury@sify.com
tswestafrica@yahoo.com
tupa@theosofie.net
tupress@theosociety.org
ult@ult.org
ult@ultlon.freeserve.co.uk
ult_blr@vsnl.net
ultinla@juno.com
ULTinSF@webtv.net
ultny@aol.com
ultontario@sympatico.ca
ultparis@worldnet.fr
ultphila@aol.com
unionteo@prtc.net
veligon_ts@hotbox.ru
viajero@supernet.com.bo
webmaster@blavatskytrust.org.uk
webmaster@goetheanum.ch
webmaster@theosophical.ca
website@theosmail.net

---220---

willman@templeofthepeople.org
youngtheos@theosmail.net
Young-Theosophists@yahoogroups.com
Young-Theosophists-owner@yahoogroups.com
zetamex@psi.net.mx

---225---

===========================

Subject: Theos-World Re: Weekly Review:
Starless Galaxy Said Found
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:47:11 EST
From: leonmaurer@aol.com
Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

Greg,

I appreciate your comments. But, sorry about
my "dense" writing... I always
have in mind that scientists are reading my
letters.:-) In fact, the one
sent to you was also posted to the Mind-Brain
forum that attracts a lot of
neuroscientists and cognitive psychologists.
Most of the scientific references are
meant for them. Although, if you are
interested in coming up to date on the
current scientific thinking that is
approaching ABC, there are some easy to
read outlines on string theory that is
beginning to shake up some of the old
paradigms of physics at:
http://superstringtheory.com/basics/index.html

http://www.sukidog.com/jpierre/strings/tutor.htm

You might also find interesting this
dissertation on the "Holographic
Paradigm" of Bohm and Pribram that adds some
credibility to my model.
http://twm.co.nz/hologram.html

Problem is that these theories, still resting
on a physical or material
concept of reality, are mostly based on
mathematical equations and purely physical
principles that don't include consciousness
(awareness, will) and absolute or
universal knowledge as an integral part of
the fundamental reality -- that was
totally existent (if only in noumena)
*before* their inferred "Big Bang"
phenomena.

Actually, in most current scientific theories
the B.B. refers only to the
physical or metric universe coming into
visible (reductively inferred or sensory
or instrumentally detectable) existence --
after (as ABC sees it) passing
through at least six previous stages of fully
conscious metaphysical existence's
(not to mention its previous "Absolute"
existence).

Incidentally, this (besides its conformance
with all Eastern philosophical
metaphysical theories such as those in the
Secret Doctrine) almost exactly
corresponds to the 7 hyperspace dimensions
plus 3 physical dimensions of Greene's
11 dimensional superstring theory -- and also
presages the "holographic
paradigm" of Bohm/Pribram. Trouble is, they
still can't see the forest for the
trees... And, aside from their mathematical
interpretations, which hardly anyone
understands from a metaphysical point of
view, everything is pretty much garbled
up... (Like, trying to fit square pegs in
round holes. :-)

My ABC theory, on the other hand, includes
all that, but takes physics down
to its most primitive pre cosmic level, and
deduces everything from there on
out in a much more straightforward manner --
without any contrived mathematics,
"strange attractors," "gravitational
constants," "dark matter" and other vague
concepts to explain the anomalies their
equations lead them to.

All I'm saying in the ABC model, is that the
"strings" and "membranes" of the
most advanced Superstring/M-brane theory --
which includes the "particles"
and "waves" of both quantum and relativity
theories (if any of it actually
exists as such) -- must originate on the
highest order spiritual metaphysical level
and emanate, involve and evolve fractally --
as fields within fields within
fields of different orders of vibrational
spectrums -- directly from the
absolute (empty and static) zero-point and
its surrounding "spinergy,"

In this view, the waves or vibrations of the
initial G-force are fundamental,
and the particles are simply entanglements or
knots of those waves that
appear to our instruments as packets of
mass-energy -- that Einstein equated as
E=mC^2... Apparently, simply for purposes of
mathematical analysis -- so that
"time," which is a function of C or the
velocity of the light "photons" could be
treated as a vector.

In ABC theory, on the other hand, time is
simply a measure of change, and all
physical phenomena (on the lowest order level
or field of energy that we
experience) is due to the cyclic nature of
the initial "spinergy" of the Absolute
or fundamental Space, as well as attraction
and repulsion or positive and
negative aspects of the vibrations of its
emanated, and ultimately involved and
evolved lines of force in each descending
hyperspace field of energy.

Naturally, all this can be mathematically
symbolized -- as they do, from a
materialistic point of view using different
functions and different methods of
calculus in relativity, quantum, and string
theories. None of that, however,
is inconsistent with the basic assumptions of
ABC from an enfolded globular
geometric and inter-field coenergetic
metaphysical point of view... That has no
problem dealing with the infinitesimal
zero-point, the infinity of the space
that emanates from it, and connecting them
reasonably with everything in between.

Further, in its ultimate simplicity, ABC
postulates that both consciousness
(awareness and will at the zero-point) and
matter/energy or "substance" (the
angular momentum or "G-force" of the spinning
of that point on infinite axes at
infinite velocities) are the fundamental dual
aspects of "Absolute Space" out
of which everything originates -- including
the form and structure of the
universe -- which is carried as infinite
degrees of encoded *information* in the
holographic "memory" (vibrational
interference patterns of the lines of
G-force) circling endlessly in the primal
"Spinergy."

As the "spinergy" unfolds or emanates
radially outward in opposite directions,
these opposing forces become the root of the
fundamentally attractive and
repulsive gravitational force. Since the
parallel lines of positive and
negative force in each field (as they involve
like bubbles within bubbles, within
bubbles ad infinitum, etc.) also spirally
wind together to form the surfaces of
the fields -- along with the holographically
encoded vibrational patterns of
energy between them -- they are analogous
forerunners of the spiral ladder of
the twin stranded DNA molecule that is the
root of all forms of organic beings
on the lowest physical level. (This is where
the initial simplicity that
evolves into ultimate complexity becomes
evident and, consequently, detectable and
measurable.)

Thus, due to the interference patterns of
vibrations that are forever
retained in the ubiquitous zero-point
"spinergy" (or "Akashic Field" as Eastern
philosophies call it) -- the Cosmos has
inherent intelligence or infinite
holographic knowledge of all its past
experiences and formations... Implying, also,

that the Cosmos itself evolves and devolves
cyclically.

It also follows -- since the zero-points in
any aspect of multidimensional
space-time are dimensionless (directionally)
and, therefore, all in the same
place in Absolute Space -- that the universal
or Absolute Space is infinitely
divisible and infinitely expandable...
Something, conventional science still
refuses to acknowledge (except, perhaps, in
relativity theory).

Therefore, from a theosophical point of view,
that zero-point and its
circular spin-force ("Spinergy") is what we
might call the "Absolute" or God nature
of the universe -- that is everywhere...
Since, after the primal spinergy
emanates and fractally involves into the
spherical fields within fields within
fields (analogous to the multidimensional
hyperspaces of string theory) -- the
zero-point centers of all fields of energy
are spread out through the entire
vacuum of space between all of Science's so
called physical "particles" or
"strings." Thus, we might say, God
(impersonal) is everywhere and in everything
--
and therefore, "omnipresent, omniscient, and
omnipotent" -- as is constantly
reiterated in all the esoteric philosophies
of Eastern metaphysics.

To conclude, the only "superstrings" in the
ABC theory are the lines or rays
of force that emanate from the initial
"Spinergy"... The "membranes" are the
surfaces of the fields they form... And, the
"particles" are simply those one
dimensional lines of that force in various
stable "knot-like" 3-dimensional
configurations on every metaphysical and
physical plane... Accounting for both
their physical-material particle/wavelike
nature on our lower "space-time"
plane of measurable existence... That, in
contrast to the ubiquitous static, non
local zero-point of fundamental reality, is
constantly changing with respect to
our consciousness or awareness of its forms.
How else could absolute changes
in relative motion be detected by us no
matter what our point of view (as
Einstein clearly pointed out in his special
relativity theory)?

This, of course, implies that the zero-point
itself is the singular origin
and source of both our awareness and will or
intent -- which are, therefore, a
priori aspects of Absolute Space -- both
prior to and after the Big Bang of
physical science. And, further, that these
functions are ubiquitous throughout
all of configuration space; Yet, dependent
for their physical impression and
expression on the complexity of the neural
networks and the organization of the
organic forms surrounding them and that
originate from their spinergy.

Therefore, qualia (or, the "experience of
consciousness") is the fundamental
nature of the zero-point itself... And,
consequently, cannot be "explained"
using currently conventional scientific
paradigms. It also leads us much deeper
into understanding the possibility that mind
and memory, etc., are functions
of higher order "fields" of energy
independent of the brain-body, and
therefore, that consciousness and ideation's
can remain effective after death.

That's about as simple as it can get...
Although the complexities due to the
interference's of all the possible vibrations
on all metaphysical and physical
levels can be infinite in scope... Thus,
explaining all the infinite
possibilities of nature (not to mention those
of our imaginations :-).

Therefore, from a fundamental point of view,
all the laws of physics (as well
as those governing karma and reincarnation)
can be reduced to the laws of
cycles and periodicity originating in the
zero-point and its surrounding
spinergy. To go into that fully, however,
and explain every detail, might take a tome
equivalent to all the books and papers
written on both metaphysics and
physics (not to mention philosophy) for the
past few hundred years or so. :-)

As for a final equation that would boil it
down to an ultimate "unified field
theory of everything"... I doubt if it will
be one that only considers the
physical aspects of matter (such as E=mc^2
that describes the nature of the
metric space time continuum) -- without
taking into consideration that
consciousness has as much (if not more)
influence on the nature of reality (as we
perceive it) as matter does. Actually, I
believe (as ABC hypothesizes) that forms of
matter could not exist independently of
awareness/will -- which must serve as
its fundamental "guiding" as well as
"motivating" influence. When all of
science realizes that -- perhaps then we'll
see a new scientific/metaphysical
paradigm evolve that will explain all the
current paradoxes and anomalies
(including psi phenomena) -- that not only
separates the psychic world from the
material world as we experience them, but
also prevents us from understanding their
reflexively causative interconnections.

All in all, the difficulty in literally
describing the ABC theory in less
dense ways, is like trying to explain the
quality of the smell of a rose, or any
transcendent experience, without using
analogies and correspondences or
metaphors. :-) Although, as you recognized,
it does lend itself to more or less
graphical methods of explanation. But,
mostly, it requires one to have a fully
developed vivid imagination that can see
beyond the veil of illusory matter that
fools us into believing that whatever we see
in our mind's eye is really out
there.

Can we imagine that the "light" field we see
in our head doesn't have the
same analogous range of frequency variations
(albeit on a higher order of energy
vibrations) as the photonic light that
bounces off the objects out there? If
not -- then, wouldn't that inner "light" be
what in Eastern metaphysical
science is called the "Astral Light"? And,
how else could the "real" image in it
be detected as the hologram we perceive
except by the point source of the
projected coherent inner ray of that inner
"light" field that reconstructs the
outer objective image after processing by the
eye-brain system, and transmitted
inductively (or resonantly) through its em
field (at its physical light
frequencies) to the am field (at its astral
light frequencies)?

However, while I can easily picture this
multidmensional involutional and
evolutional process in my (fundamentally dual
as I see it) mind, and possibly
illustrate it in 3-D graphic animation, it is
almost impossible to prove it using
any scientific method, or even adequately
explain it in such an ambiguous la
nguage as English. (Thus accounting for the
"density" in trying to
linguistically consolidate a theory of
physics with a theory of information from a
metaphysical point of view that gives equal
weight to both consciousness and matter
as two complementary sides of one reality.)

Apropos, I have been working on an animated
version of the entire ABC concept
for the past ten years (based on my expertise
in all the visual arts,
including movie special effects, and as a
pioneer in 3-D computer animation) and have
even a storyboard for it (partially on paper
but mostly in my head:-). The
only problem is that there's little hope of a
sufficient budget to produce it
in the computer -- without having a best
selling book by a recognized
scientific authority with academic
credentials such as Green's, Penrose,
Hawkings, etc.
Also, the ability to publish peer reviewable
papers in respected scientific
journals would be helpful.

Unfortunately, my academic credentials
prohibit that, and I have yet to find
a collaborator (with proper accreditation)
capable of filling in the physical
scientific details and mathematics necessary
to round out my voluminous notes
for the prospective book I began assembling
over ten years ago. I still have
several hundred letters written to various
scientific forums studying
consciousness that have to be collated. So,
until I find such collaboration, I'm
afraid my laziness (coupled with my age, and
frustration due to lack of
credentials :-) will prevent much further
progress.

Although, there are several metaphysically
oriented films in the works, that
may be able to use my storyboard -- as an
introductory title, perhaps. But,
that's still somewhat of a long shot. Maybe,
it will have to wait until the
next episode of "What the Bleep do we know"
comes along. (But, I don't suppose
that will be until some recognized academic
scientist takes credit for
discovering and proving ABC, or helps me
write my book. :-)

In any event, your laziness in trying to
visualize ABC graphically is a proble
m many people have. But overcoming that
laziness is probably the only way
the ABC theory will ever be fully understood
by them.:-) Some of us come by
that naturally. But for others, it seems
that there is some truth in the occult
teaching that one can only reach the
transcendent states of consciousness and
arrive at a full understanding of the true
nature of reality, by means of deep
and concentrated meditation that ultimately
unites the left and right brain
and somehow transcends our ordinary way of
thinking.

Also being lazy, one way I have found to
understand any complex graphical
idea stated in words, is to read or sing
(chant) them out loud, with proper
inflections and intonations (while trying to
picture it graphically in my
imagination and also drawing it on an
imaginary piece of paper) -- as if I were
trying
to explain it to someone else. I find that
method very satisfying, and I have
learned a lot of obscure scientific,
metaphysical and technological concepts
that way. BTW, I do that in reverse when I
write about ABC. (So, using that
subjective audiovisual technique while
reading my stuff may be a good way to
make my writing density a bit more
transparent. :-)

Best regards,

Lenny
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics

For help in visualization, See:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/TaiChiFldDiag-figure-2.gif

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafielddiag-fig.col.jpg



In a message dated 03/04/05 10:40:16 AM,
Greg.......@....... writes:

>Lenny - I think I'm starting to get an
inkling of a picture of what you
>are talking about with this "ABC" theory of
yours. However, I must say
>that if this is supposed to be the
simplified explanation, I'd hate to
>see the complicated one.
>
>Visually, the sheer number of words, as well
as the specialized references
> you make (M-Brane/String theory,
"Spinergy", etc) you use in describing
>this just appears dense -- almost
impenetrable. But as I was reading it
>and thinking that -- i.e.. the way the words
appeared visually on the page,
>I began wondering if this could be made
into some kind of animated cartoon
>story -- perhaps narrated -- sort of like
Brian Green's "Elegant Universe"
>program on PBS.
>
>Or maybe I'm just being dense & lazy myself
here.
>
> Anyway, thanks for sharing this. I will
keep trying to unfold it in my
>own consciousness.
>
> Regards, Greg

-------- Original Message--------

Here's an interesting confirmation that "dark
matter" or negative G-force
exists and forms invisible systems similar to
the "light matter" stars and
galaxies we can see...

>ScientificAmerican.com - Weekly Review
March 01, 2005
>
>** Starless Galaxy Said Found
>
>Astronomers announced Wednesday that they
have discovered what is
>believed to be the first dark galaxy ever
detected, a starless mass
>of spinning matter located some 50 million
light-years away in the
>Virgo cluster of galaxies.
>
>http://cl.exct.net/?ffcd16-fe61157577620d7f7115-fe23167073670c7b7c1678

Could this be the beginning of the scientific
evidence beginning to pile up
that will eventually verify the
holographically unified ABC hyperspace field
theory/model -- that almost exactly conforms
with the theosophical metaphysics
outlined in the *Secret Doctrine* along with
the formulas in the *Book of
Dzyan* (that underlie all Eastern
philosophical systems of Cosmogenesis and the

relationship between consciousness and
matter) -- and which is also consistent
with relativity and quantum field theories as
synthesized within the latest
versions of superstring/M-brane and string
field theories of Kaku. Greene, etc.,
and hinted at by the "holographic paradigm"
and "implicate-explicate order"
concepts of Bohm, Pribram, etc.?

Incidentally, ABC theory predicts dark field
galaxies and star systems that
are analogous and corresponding to the light
field systems of our visible
universe... Also, in contrast to most
scientific approaches to a unified field
theory of everything, the ABC model, which is
based on deductive reasoning
starting from fundamental principles, fully
resolves the relationship as well as the
separation between consciousness and
matter... i.e.; It sees them as the
fundamental dual aspects of the motionless or
static zero-point of Absolute or
primal Space (as the source of awareness and
intent or will) and its eternally
moving or dynamic surrounding "Spinergy" or
G-force (as the source of all
substance or matter/energy) -- by connecting
them, holistically, through the
fractally descending (frequency-energy)
orders of inductively resonant hyperspace (or

"Astral") fields that, through coenergetic
relationships, fill the "vacuum"
of the Planck distance (in metric space)
between all fundamental quantum
particles and the ubiquitous zero-point of
Absolute Space. Such fields, in turn,
resonate analogously with the holographic em
"image" fields of the brain to
serve as the link between awareness/intent
and the senses and neural kinesthetic
control mechanisms of the body.

This system/process -- coenergetically
linking the holographic
electromagnetic field of the brain with the
higher order fields of consciousness
(mind-memory, etc.) -- also confirms the
possibility of all psi phenomena as well as
both
the non location of consciousness throughout
the entire universe... And may
account for the entanglement of all
corresponding particles or energy packets
surrounding each zero-point of
consciousness... Thus, fully resolving the
hard
problems of explaining both qualia (or the
experience of consciousness) and
brain-mind binding (that has baffled science
since it became separated from
philosophy for the past few hundred years).
In addition, it modifies information
theory by separating the "contents of
consciousness" from its "experience" ...
i.e., By allocating the "images" of
perception to the wave interference
patterns of energy on the surface of the
"coadunate but not consubstantial"
hyperspace fields, and allocating the
awareness-will functions of consciousness to
their zero-points of origination in the
Planck vacuum -- empowered by their
surrounding "spinergy" of infinite momenta
and referenced to the static "laya"
point of Absolute space -- which is
everywhere.

If so, then the fractal involution (like
bubbles within bubbles within
bubbles. etc.) of the "coadunate but not
consubstantial fields of consciousness"
emanated out of the initial "spinergy"
("abstract motion, infinite angular
momentum" or G-force) surrounding the
ubiquitous (non local) zero-point of Absolute

space -- exactly reflected in the dark
matter/substance fields and linked
together by the dual positive-negative
(attractive-repulsive) force of gravity --
is the only way the Cosmos could cyclically
manifest, involve, evolve and
devolve, while maintaining eternal existence
(Brahma's lifetime per the Vedic
interpretation) in relative harmony and
balance between one Manvantara/Pralaya
(waking /sleeping) period and another.

**See:
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif

Also see the theosophical correspondences at:

http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html

http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif

Respectfully,

Leon Maurer
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics