Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00345)

Greg,

I appreciate your comments. But, sorry about my "dense" writing... I always 
have in mind that scientists are reading my letters.:-) In fact, the one 
sent to you was also posted to the Mind-Brain forum that attracts a lot of 
neuroscientists and cognitive psychologists. Most of the scientific references are 
meant for them. Although, if you are interested in coming up to date on the 
current scientific thinking that is approaching ABC, there are some easy to 
read outlines on string theory that is beginning to shake up some of the old 
paradigms of physics at: 
http://superstringtheory.com/basics/index.html
http://www.sukidog.com/jpierre/strings/tutor.htm

You might also find interesting this dissertation on the "Holographic 
Paradigm" of Bohm and Pribram that adds some credibility to my model. 
http://twm.co.nz/hologram.html

Problem is that these theories, still resting on a physical or material 
concept of reality, are mostly based on mathematical equations and purely physical 
principles that don't include consciousness (awareness, will) and absolute or 
universal knowledge as an integral part of the fundamental reality -- that was 
totally existent (if only in noumena) *before* their inferred "Big Bang" 
phenomena. 

Actually, in most current scientific theories the B.B. refers only to the 
physical or metric universe coming into visible (reductively inferred or sensory 
or instrumentally detectable) existence -- after (as ABC sees it) passing 
through at least six previous stages of fully conscious metaphysical existence's 
(not to mention its previous "Absolute" existence). 

Incidentally, this (besides its conformance with all Eastern philosophical 
metaphysical theories such as those in the Secret Doctrine) almost exactly 
corresponds to the 7 hyperspace dimensions plus 3 physical dimensions of Greene's 
11 dimensional superstring theory -- and also presages the "holographic 
paradigm" of Bohm/Pribram. Trouble is, they still can't see the forest for the 
trees... And, aside from their mathematical interpretations, which hardly anyone 
understands from a metaphysical point of view, everything is pretty much garbled 
up... (Like, trying to fit square pegs in round holes. :-)

My ABC theory, on the other hand, includes all that, but takes physics down 
to its most primitive pre cosmic level, and deduces everything from there on 
out in a much more straightforward manner -- without any contrived mathematics, 
"strange attractors," "gravitational constants," "dark matter" and other vague 
concepts to explain the anomalies their equations lead them to.

All I'm saying in the ABC model, is that the "strings" and "membranes" of the 
most advanced Superstring/M-brane theory -- which includes the "particles" 
and "waves" of both quantum and relativity theories (if any of it actually 
exists as such) -- must originate on the highest order spiritual metaphysical level 
and emanate, involve and evolve fractally -- as fields within fields within 
fields of different orders of vibrational spectrums -- directly from the 
absolute (empty and static) zero-point and its surrounding "spinergy," 

In this view, the waves or vibrations of the initial G-force are fundamental, 
and the particles are simply entanglements or knots of those waves that 
appear to our instruments as packets of mass-energy -- that Einstein equated as 
E=mC^2... Apparently, simply for purposes of mathematical analysis -- so that 
"time," which is a function of C or the velocity of the light "photons" could be 
treated as a vector. 

In ABC theory, on the other hand, time is simply a measure of change, and all 
physical phenomena (on the lowest order level or field of energy that we 
experience) is due to the cyclic nature of the initial "spinergy" of the Absolute 
or fundamental Space, as well as attraction and repulsion or positive and 
negative aspects of the vibrations of its emanated, and ultimately involved and 
evolved lines of force in each descending hyperspace field of energy. 

Naturally, all this can be mathematically symbolized -- as they do, from a 
materialistic point of view using different functions and different methods of 
calculus in relativity, quantum, and string theories. None of that, however, 
is inconsistent with the basic assumptions of ABC from an enfolded globular 
geometric and inter-field coenergetic metaphysical point of view... That has no 
problem dealing with the infinitesimal zero-point, the infinity of the space 
that emanates from it, and connecting them reasonably with everything in between.

Further, in its ultimate simplicity, ABC postulates that both consciousness 
(awareness and will at the zero-point) and matter/energy or "substance" (the 
angular momentum or "G-force" of the spinning of that point on infinite axes at 
infinite velocities) are the fundamental dual aspects of "Absolute Space" out 
of which everything originates -- including the form and structure of the 
universe -- which is carried as infinite degrees of encoded *information* in the 
holographic "memory" (vibrational interference patterns of the lines of 
G-force) circling endlessly in the primal "Spinergy." 

As the "spinergy" unfolds or emanates radially outward in opposite directions,
these opposing forces become the root of the fundamentally attractive and 
repulsive gravitational force. Since the parallel lines of positive and 
negative force in each field (as they involve like bubbles within bubbles, within 
bubbles ad infinitum, etc.) also spirally wind together to form the surfaces of 
the fields -- along with the holographically encoded vibrational patterns of 
energy between them -- they are analogous forerunners of the spiral ladder of 
the twin stranded DNA molecule that is the root of all forms of organic beings 
on the lowest physical level. (This is where the initial simplicity that 
evolves into ultimate complexity becomes evident and, consequently, detectable and 
measurable.)

Thus, due to the interference patterns of vibrations that are forever 
retained in the ubiquitous zero-point "spinergy" (or "Akashic Field" as Eastern 
philosophies call it) -- the Cosmos has inherent intelligence or infinite 
holographic knowledge of all its past experiences and formations... Implying, also, 
that the Cosmos itself evolves and devolves cyclically. 

It also follows -- since the zero-points in any aspect of multidimensional 
space-time are dimensionless (directionally) and, therefore, all in the same 
place in Absolute Space -- that the universal or Absolute Space is infinitely 
divisible and infinitely expandable... Something, conventional science still 
refuses to acknowledge (except, perhaps, in relativity theory). 

Therefore, from a theosophical point of view, that zero-point and its 
circular spin-force ("Spinergy") is what we might call the "Absolute" or God nature 
of the universe -- that is everywhere... Since, after the primal spinergy 
emanates and fractally involves into the spherical fields within fields within 
fields (analogous to the multidimensional hyperspaces of string theory) -- the 
zero-point centers of all fields of energy are spread out through the entire 
vacuum of space between all of Science's so called physical "particles" or 
"strings." Thus, we might say, God (impersonal) is everywhere and in everything -- 
and therefore, "omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent" -- as is constantly 
reiterated in all the esoteric philosophies of Eastern metaphysics. 

To conclude, the only "superstrings" in the ABC theory are the lines or rays 
of force that emanate from the initial "Spinergy"... The "membranes" are the 
surfaces of the fields they form... And, the "particles" are simply those one 
dimensional lines of that force in various stable "knot-like" 3-dimensional 
configurations on every metaphysical and physical plane... Accounting for both 
their physical-material particle/wavelike nature on our lower "space-time" 
plane of measurable existence... That, in contrast to the ubiquitous static, non 
local zero-point of fundamental reality, is constantly changing with respect to 
our consciousness or awareness of its forms. How else could absolute changes 
in relative motion be detected by us no matter what our point of view (as 
Einstein clearly pointed out in his special relativity theory)? 

This, of course, implies that the zero-point itself is the singular origin 
and source of both our awareness and will or intent -- which are, therefore, a 
priori aspects of Absolute Space -- both prior to and after the Big Bang of 
physical science. And, further, that these functions are ubiquitous throughout 
all of configuration space; Yet, dependent for their physical impression and 
expression on the complexity of the neural networks and the organization of the 
organic forms surrounding them and that originate from their spinergy. 

Therefore, qualia (or, the "experience of consciousness") is the fundamental 
nature of the zero-point itself... And, consequently, cannot be "explained" 
using currently conventional scientific paradigms. It also leads us much deeper 
into understanding the possibility that mind and memory, etc., are functions 
of higher order "fields" of energy independent of the brain-body, and 
therefore, that consciousness and ideation's can remain effective after death. 

That's about as simple as it can get... Although the complexities due to the 
interference's of all the possible vibrations on all metaphysical and physical 
levels can be infinite in scope... Thus, explaining all the infinite 
possibilities of nature (not to mention those of our imaginations :-). 

Therefore, from a fundamental point of view, all the laws of physics (as well 
as those governing karma and reincarnation) can be reduced to the laws of 
cycles and periodicity originating in the zero-point and its surrounding 
spinergy. To go into that fully, however, and explain every detail, might take a tome 
equivalent to all the books and papers written on both metaphysics and 
physics (not to mention philosophy) for the past few hundred years or so. :-) 

As for a final equation that would boil it down to an ultimate "unified field 
theory of everything"... I doubt if it will be one that only considers the 
physical aspects of matter (such as E=mc^2 that describes the nature of the 
metric space time continuum) -- without taking into consideration that 
consciousness has as much (if not more) influence on the nature of reality (as we 
perceive it) as matter does. Actually, I believe (as ABC hypothesizes) that forms of 
matter could not exist independently of awareness/will -- which must serve as 
its fundamental "guiding" as well as "motivating" influence. When all of 
science realizes that -- perhaps then we'll see a new scientific/metaphysical 
paradigm evolve that will explain all the current paradoxes and anomalies 
(including psi phenomena) -- that not only separates the psychic world from the 
material world as we experience them, but also prevents us from understanding their 
reflexively causative interconnections.

All in all, the difficulty in literally describing the ABC theory in less 
dense ways, is like trying to explain the quality of the smell of a rose, or any 
transcendent experience, without using analogies and correspondences or 
metaphors. :-) Although, as you recognized, it does lend itself to more or less 
graphical methods of explanation. But, mostly, it requires one to have a fully 
developed vivid imagination that can see beyond the veil of illusory matter that 
fools us into believing that whatever we see in our mind's eye is really out 
there. 

Can we imagine that the "light" field we see in our head doesn't have the 
same analogous range of frequency variations (albeit on a higher order of energy 
vibrations) as the photonic light that bounces off the objects out there? If 
not -- then, wouldn't that inner "light" be what in Eastern metaphysical 
science is called the "Astral Light"? And, how else could the "real" image in it 
be detected as the hologram we perceive except by the point source of the 
projected coherent inner ray of that inner "light" field that reconstructs the 
outer objective image after processing by the eye-brain system, and transmitted 
inductively (or resonantly) through its em field (at its physical light 
frequencies) to the am field (at its astral light frequencies)? 

However, while I can easily picture this multidmensional involutional and 
evolutional process in my (fundamentally dual as I see it) mind, and possibly 
illustrate it in 3-D graphic animation, it is almost impossible to prove it using 
any scientific method, or even adequately explain it in such an ambiguous la
nguage as English. (Thus accounting for the "density" in trying to 
linguistically consolidate a theory of physics with a theory of information from a 
metaphysical point of view that gives equal weight to both consciousness and matter 
as two complementary sides of one reality.)

Apropos, I have been working on an animated version of the entire ABC concept 
for the past ten years (based on my expertise in all the visual arts, 
including movie special effects, and as a pioneer in 3-D computer animation) and have 
even a storyboard for it (partially on paper but mostly in my head:-). The 
only problem is that there's little hope of a sufficient budget to produce it 
in the computer -- without having a best selling book by a recognized 
scientific authority with academic credentials such as Green's, Penrose, Hawkings, etc. 
Also, the ability to publish peer reviewable papers in respected scientific 
journals would be helpful. 

Unfortunately, my academic credentials prohibit that, and I have yet to find 
a collaborator (with proper accreditation) capable of filling in the physical 
scientific details and mathematics necessary to round out my voluminous notes 
for the prospective book I began assembling over ten years ago. I still have 
several hundred letters written to various scientific forums studying 
consciousness that have to be collated. So, until I find such collaboration, I'm 
afraid my laziness (coupled with my age, and frustration due to lack of 
credentials :-) will prevent much further progress. 

Although, there are several metaphysically oriented films in the works, that 
may be able to use my storyboard -- as an introductory title, perhaps. But, 
that's still somewhat of a long shot. Maybe, it will have to wait until the 
next episode of "What the Bleep do we know" comes along. (But, I don't suppose 
that will be until some recognized academic scientist takes credit for 
discovering and proving ABC, or helps me write my book. :-) 

In any event, your laziness in trying to visualize ABC graphically is a proble
m many people have. But overcoming that laziness is probably the only way 
the ABC theory will ever be fully understood by them.:-) Some of us come by 
that naturally. But for others, it seems that there is some truth in the occult 
teaching that one can only reach the transcendent states of consciousness and 
arrive at a full understanding of the true nature of reality, by means of deep 
and concentrated meditation that ultimately unites the left and right brain 
and somehow transcends our ordinary way of thinking. 

Also being lazy, one way I have found to understand any complex graphical 
idea stated in words, is to read or sing (chant) them out loud, with proper 
inflections and intonations (while trying to picture it graphically in my 
imagination and also drawing it on an imaginary piece of paper) -- as if I were trying 
to explain it to someone else. I find that method very satisfying, and I have 
learned a lot of obscure scientific, metaphysical and technological concepts 
that way. BTW, I do that in reverse when I write about ABC. (So, using that 
subjective audiovisual technique while reading my stuff may be a good way to 
make my writing density a bit more transparent. :-) 

Best regards, 

Lenny
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics
For help in visualization, See:
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/invlutionflddiagnotate.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/TaiChiFldDiag-figure-2.gif
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafielddiag-fig.col.jpg


In a message dated 03/04/05 10:40:16 AM, Greg.......@....... writes:

>Lenny - I think I'm starting to get an inkling of a picture of what you
>are talking about with this "ABC" theory of yours. However, I must say
>that if this is supposed to be the simplified explanation, I'd hate to
>see the complicated one.
>
>Visually, the sheer number of words, as well as the specialized references
> you make (M-Brane/String theory, "Spinergy", etc) you use in describing
>this just appears dense -- almost impenetrable. But as I was reading it
>and thinking that -- i.e.. the way the words appeared visually on the page,
>I began wondering if this could be made into some kind of animated cartoon
>story -- perhaps narrated -- sort of like Brian Green's "Elegant Universe"
>program on PBS.
>
>Or maybe I'm just being dense & lazy myself here.
>
> Anyway, thanks for sharing this. I will keep trying to unfold it in my
>own consciousness.
>
> Regards, Greg

-------- Original Message--------

Here's an interesting confirmation that "dark matter" or negative G-force 
exists and forms invisible systems similar to the "light matter" stars and 
galaxies we can see... 

>ScientificAmerican.com - Weekly Review March 01, 2005
>
>** Starless Galaxy Said Found 
> 
>Astronomers announced Wednesday that they have discovered what is 
>believed to be the first dark galaxy ever detected, a starless mass 
>of spinning matter located some 50 million light-years away in the 
>Virgo cluster of galaxies. 
>
>http://cl.exct.net/?ffcd16-fe61157577620d7f7115-fe23167073670c7b7c1678

Could this be the beginning of the scientific evidence beginning to pile up 
that will eventually verify the holographically unified ABC hyperspace field 
theory/model -- that almost exactly conforms with the theosophical metaphysics 
outlined in the *Secret Doctrine* along with the formulas in the *Book of 
Dzyan* (that underlie all Eastern philosophical systems of Cosmogenesis and the 
relationship between consciousness and matter) -- and which is also consistent 
with relativity and quantum field theories as synthesized within the latest 
versions of superstring/M-brane and string field theories of Kaku. Greene, etc., 
and hinted at by the "holographic paradigm" and "implicate-explicate order" 
concepts of Bohm, Pribram, etc.? 

Incidentally, ABC theory predicts dark field galaxies and star systems that 
are analogous and corresponding to the light field systems of our visible 
universe... Also, in contrast to most scientific approaches to a unified field 
theory of everything, the ABC model, which is based on deductive reasoning 
starting from fundamental principles, fully resolves the relationship as well as the 
separation between consciousness and matter... i.e.; It sees them as the 
fundamental dual aspects of the motionless or static zero-point of Absolute or 
primal Space (as the source of awareness and intent or will) and its eternally 
moving or dynamic surrounding "Spinergy" or G-force (as the source of all 
substance or matter/energy) -- by connecting them, holistically, through the 
fractally descending (frequency-energy) orders of inductively resonant hyperspace (or 
"Astral") fields that, through coenergetic relationships, fill the "vacuum" 
of the Planck distance (in metric space) between all fundamental quantum 
particles and the ubiquitous zero-point of Absolute Space. Such fields, in turn, 
resonate analogously with the holographic em "image" fields of the brain to 
serve as the link between awareness/intent and the senses and neural kinesthetic 
control mechanisms of the body. 

This system/process -- coenergetically linking the holographic 
electromagnetic field of the brain with the higher order fields of consciousness 
(mind-memory, etc.) -- also confirms the possibility of all psi phenomena as well as both 
the non location of consciousness throughout the entire universe... And may 
account for the entanglement of all corresponding particles or energy packets 
surrounding each zero-point of consciousness... Thus, fully resolving the hard 
problems of explaining both qualia (or the experience of consciousness) and 
brain-mind binding (that has baffled science since it became separated from 
philosophy for the past few hundred years). In addition, it modifies information 
theory by separating the "contents of consciousness" from its "experience" ... 
i.e., By allocating the "images" of perception to the wave interference 
patterns of energy on the surface of the "coadunate but not consubstantial" 
hyperspace fields, and allocating the awareness-will functions of consciousness to 
their zero-points of origination in the Planck vacuum -- empowered by their 
surrounding "spinergy" of infinite momenta and referenced to the static "laya" 
point of Absolute space -- which is everywhere. 

If so, then the fractal involution (like bubbles within bubbles within 
bubbles. etc.) of the "coadunate but not consubstantial fields of consciousness" 
emanated out of the initial "spinergy" ("abstract motion, infinite angular 
momentum" or G-force) surrounding the ubiquitous (non local) zero-point of Absolute 
space -- exactly reflected in the dark matter/substance fields and linked 
together by the dual positive-negative (attractive-repulsive) force of gravity -- 
is the only way the Cosmos could cyclically manifest, involve, evolve and 
devolve, while maintaining eternal existence (Brahma's lifetime per the Vedic 
interpretation) in relative harmony and balance between one Manvantara/Pralaya 
(waking /sleeping) period and another.

**See: http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/Invlutionfldmirror2.gif
Also see the theosophical correspondences at: 
http://users.aol.com/uniwldarts/uniworld.artisans.guild/chakrafield.html
http://users.aol.com/leonmaurer/BuddhaBabyGordianKnot.gif

Respectfully,

Leon Maurer
http://tellworld.com/Astro.Biological.Coenergetics