Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00290)

Hallo Anand and all,

1.
I understand it so, that you also talk about the CWL and Radha Burnier 
situation at Theos-talk.
Even IF this - you mention in the below - is the the truth about ALL of 
those discussing the "revered leaders" you talk about,-
then your remarks will not be very helpful - would they?
(The reason why - it is so - is, that the questions being posed by a number 
of honest seekers are not being answered !)

And Radha Burniers letter recently mentioned here at Theos-talk by Perry 
Coles will neither do much service to such a problem,
which you say you have heard about.

2.
Please Anand.
Anand pointing your fingers at others because you (as a promoter of CWL) 
have problem with sexuality is not a path to take.
Try thinking about what I am saying to you.
Try something more constructive.
If people are afraid - how can they be helped?
By a stonewallface (a la TS Adyar and their CWL policy) and the promotion of 
a confused bunch of "revered leaders" with a dubious reputation and 
teaching?
Well... If you are not reading what I write, how can I then be of service to 
you and your friends ?

3.
We all know being a heretic is illogical.
To promote those which are heretics as perfect initiates must also be 
illogical. (Just keep CWL in mind on that one).
CWL was sort of a theosophical heretic - because he made too many grave 
mistakes. But he also did do good deeds, no doubt there.
Things like that happen. Some people are just not willing to face the truth 
when they hear about it.

4.
It might help us all to know - that the situation on sexuality is very 
problematic on our little globe at the moment.
There are some karmic issues, which without doubt concerns some of the 
initiates very much.
Especially certain groups of theosophists and their relation to sexuality 
have the concern of the Masters themselves. (Well I claim I know that.)
A few words to ponder. Try - page 56 - in the PDF-file of Cyril Scott's 
book:
The Initiate in the New World down the page at 
(http://www.sanctusgermano.net/books/books.html )
Well... If you are not reading what I write, how can I then be of service to 
you and your friends ?

The future looks bright though - if certain steps are being taken. One of 
them is choosing to be honest about the TRUTH.
--- There is no religion higher than Truth ---




M. Sufilight


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@AnandGholap.org>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Criticizing revered leaders under sweet name of 
philosophizing


> I heard people are interested in their subconscious mind in certain
> subjects like sex and then conscious mind finds reasons to discuss
> that subject.
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "M. Sufilight" <global-
> theosophy@s...> wrote:
> > Perhaps they find it logical to raise a voice in protest
> > against illogical policies and promotions of theosophy.
> >
> > Blavatsky also raised many times her voice in protest
> > against various orthodox teachings.
> >
> > We know, that Atma = Brahman
> > and that Brahman is omnipresent.
> >
> > So why promote somthing which are not in accordance with this?
> >
> >
> >
> > M. Sufilight
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Anand Gholap" <AnandGholap@A...>
> > To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:03 PM
> > Subject: Theos-World Criticizing revered leaders under sweet name
> of
> > philosophizing
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Are members criticizing revered leaders under sweet name of
> > > philosophizing.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links