Theos-Talk Archives (March 2005 Message tt00122)

Of interest ?

Dallas

============================
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Fulton 
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 6:09 PM
To: 
Subject: Plants do this?

This was extracted from the March 3rd Ed. of the Christian Science
Monitor, and reposted in at Ray Kurzweil's www.kurzweilai.net (a great
site for anyone interested in the "spiritual" aspects of technology). 
While Kurzweil isn't a theosophist in the sense of being a follower of
HPB, his insights and interests are the type of thing that Blavatsky would
have probably paid very close attention to as editor of the Theosophist.

Joe Fulton


New research opens a window on the minds of plants
By Patrik Jonsson | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

RALEIGH, N.C. - Hardly articulate, the tiny strangleweed, a pale parasitic
plant, can sense the presence of friends, foes, and food, and make adroit
decisions on how to approach them.

Mustard weed, a common plant with a six-week life cycle, can't find its
way in the world if its root-tip statolith - a starchy "brain" that
communicates with the rest of the plant - is cut off.

The ground-hugging mayapple plans its growth two years into the future,
based on computations of weather patterns. And many who visit the redwoods
of the Northwest come away awed by the trees' survival for millenniums - a
journey that, for some trees, precedes the Parthenon.

As trowel-wielding scientists dig up a trove of new findings, even those
skeptical of the evolving paradigm of "plant intelligence" acknowledge
that, down to the simplest magnolia or fern, flora have the smarts of the
forest. Some scientists say they carefully consider their environment,
speculate on the future, conquer territory and enemies, and are often
capable of forethought - revelations that could affect everyone from
gardeners to philosophers.

Indeed, extraordinary new findings on how plants investigate and respond
to their environments are part of a sprouting debate over the nature of
intelligence itself.

"The attitude of people is changing quite substantially," says Anthony
Trewavas, a plant

biochemist at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland and a prominent
scholar of plant intelligence. "The idea of intelligence is going from the
very narrow view that it's just human to something that's much more
generally found in life."

To be sure, there are no signs of Socratic logic or Shakespearean thought,
and the subject of plant "brains" has sparked heated exchanges at botany
conferences. Plants, skeptics scoff, surely don't fall in love, bake
soufflés, or ponder poetry. And can a simple reaction to one's environment
truly qualify as active, intentional reasoning?

But the late Nobel Prize-winning plant geneticist Barbara McClintock
called plant cells "thoughtful." Darwin wrote about root-tip "brains." Not
only can plants communicate with each other and with insects by coded gas
exhalations, scientists say now, they can perform Euclidean geometry
calculations through cellular computations and, like a peeved boss,
remember the tiniest transgression for months.

To a growing number of biologists, the fact that plants are now known to
challenge and exert power over other species is proof of a basic
intellect.

"If intelligence is the capacity to acquire and apply knowledge, then,
absolutely, plants are intelligent," agrees Leslie Sieburth, a biologist
at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

For philosophers, one of the key findings is that two cuttings, or clones,
taken from the same "mother plant" behave differently even when planted in
identical conditions.

"We now know there's an ability of self-recognition in plants, which is
highly unusual and quite extraordinary that it's actually there," says Dr.
Trewavas. "But why has no one come to grips with it? Because the
prevailing view of a plant, even among plant biologists, is that it's a
simple organism that grows reproducibly in a flower pot."

But here at the labs on the North Carolina State campus, where fluorescent
grow-rooms hold genetic secrets and laser microscopes parse the inner
workings of live plants, there is still skepticism about the ability of
ordinary houseplants to intellectualize their environment.

Most plant biologists are still looking at the mysteries of "signal
transduction," or how genetic, chemical, and hormonal orders are dispersed
for complex plant behavior. But skeptics say it's less a product of
intelligence than mechanical directives, more genetic than genius. Some
see the attribution of intelligence to plants as relative - an
oversimplification of a complex human trait.

And despite intensifying research, exactly how a plant's complex orders
are formulated and carried out remains draped in leafy mystery.

"There is still much that we do not know about how plants work, but a big
part of intelligence is self-consciousness, and plants do not have that,"
says Heike Winter Sederoff, a plant biologist at N.C. State.

Still, a new NASA grant awarded to the university to study gravitational
effects on crop plants came in part due to new findings that plants have
neurotransmitters very similar to humans' - capable, perhaps, of offering
clues on how gravity affects more sentient beings. The National Science
Foundation has awarded a $5 million research grant to pinpoint the
molecular clockwork by which plants know when to grow and when to flower.

The new field of plant neurobiology holds its first conference - The First
Symposium on Plant Neurobiology - in May in Florence, Italy.

The debate is rapidly moving past the theoretical. In space, "smart
plants" can provide not only food, oxygen, and clean air, but also
valuable companionship for lonely space travelers, say some - a boon for
astronauts if America is to go to Mars. Research on the workings of the
mustard weed's statolith, for example, may one day yield a corn crop with
1-3/8 the gravitational force of Earth.

Some Earth-bound farmers, meanwhile, see the possibility of communicating
with plants to time waterings for ultimate growth. A new gene, Bypass-1,
found by University of Utah researchers, may make that possible.

Still, it can be hard for the common houseplant to command respect - even
among those who study it most closely.

"When I was a postdoc, I had a neighbor who watched me buy plants, forget
to water them, and throw them out, buy them and throw them out," says Dr.
Sieburth. "When she found out I had a PhD in botany, I thought she was
going to die."

---
Distributed by Blavatsky Net P.O. Box 749 Dover Plains NY 12522 USA
You are currently subscribed to bn-study as: [dalval14@earthlink.net]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-bn-study-7560482L@lists.lyris.net