Theos-Talk Archives (February 2005 Message tt00765)

--- In theos-talk, gregory wrote:
> The fantasies are running strong!
> Even militantly un- or anti-Christian scholars do not now dispute 
> the accepted dates, given a year or two.

Probably because they understood that it is not only useless but even 
dangerous to dispute with believers, which also have much money and 
power.

As far I know all the "proofs" of existence of biblical Christ
are fake.

The date about 4-7 B.C. was invented to reconcile obvious 
inconsistency with the well establishad date of Herods death.
But then it doesn't fit with life of some other ruler also mentioned 
in Bible. His name is Quirinius, if I remember correctly.