[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX] |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Feb 10, 2005 04:50 AM
by Konstantin Zaitzev
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "krishtar" <krishtar_a@b...> wrote: > He started it all, he started the division. > The worst of all IMO is that he dragged Annie B. to his inclinations, > a woman of great promise. Pardon me, but even if all you wrote were true, it was W.Q. Judge who is responsible for the first split of the theosophical movement. As far I know, he wasn't expelled but has himself divided the Society. Other numerous splits were just the echoes of the first and main one. If Besant, Olcott and Leadbeater were wrong, he could say that they are wrong, they are fools, they are villains and black magicians, and maybe they would even hate him for that and expell him, but no one could accuse him in split. In Buddhism the split of the sangha is regarded as one of the greatest falls, and it far overweights all the sins of the other side, real and imaginary, whatever they could be. This principle is quite applicable to the TS, for the brotherhood is its first object while other objects are subsidary. Remember that Leadbeater didn't held any important office in the Theosophical Society. The difference of opinion and preaching wrong teaching is not a sin at all. To accuse people in that is just ridiculous for those who call themselves theosophists.