Re: Theos-World Generational change in the 1980s TM (footnote to JHE's post)
Feb 09, 2005 01:05 PM
by Jerry Hejka-Ekins
Thanks Paul for filling in some more of the details. Your recollections
have evoked a few more of mine. It was 1986 or 87 that Michael Revere
hosted an inter-theosophical conference in New York City. I did a
presentation there on the importance of having an historical
perspective of the TM, and presented a portion of our historical
introduction we did for new members at Los Angeles Lodge. Michael was
pushing for TS people to become members of all the Theosophical
Organizations. I thought it was a good idea and did so. So did Eldon,
and some others. Around the same time, the Toronto TS had a three day
inter-theosophical conference, where my wife and I did a half day
workshop on the same subject.
Claire Walker, in Maryland was, as you say, also had a networking
newsletter, but became publicly critical of Bing Escudero's ouster from
Wheaton when he tried to run for National President. Claire eventually
moved to Long Beach and continued her newsletter through Long Beach
Lodge. We had some nice talks.
Rick Nurrie and Ken Small did have disagreements but that is all in the
past, and they are still in touch with each other. I heard from Rick a
few months ago. He is doing fine.
I recall when John and Nancy Coker, and you were part of the Frederick
and Tidewater TS (Pasadena) effort. I remember that your group's
inter-Theosophical newsletter was called "Theosophical Branchings." Too
bad it only lasted a few issues. The Cokers are still at the Pasadena
Headquarters and doting over their new grandchild. Grace Knoche is
very elderly now, and expectations are rising for a new leader to soon
appear.
you write:
The feeling I got, based on some confidential conversations with
various people, is that Wheaton "befriended" the Networking effort
only to undermine it, and that John Algeo was regarded as the person
who behind the scenes most opposed it.
Well, John Algeo's 1994 talk at Ojai makes it very clear that he indeed
opposed and sought to undermine the networking effort. Around 1986, I
was invited to attend a private meeting of those who were running things
in the TS at the time. This meeting was held at Lake Geneva during the
annual convention. At that meeting, Joy Mills made it very clear to all
present of her opposition to the networking movement. I was sitting
next to John Algeo, and asked him to speak up about the positive
experience we all had at the 1984 Krotona conference--since Joy was out
of the country at the time. John remained mute.
Our initial
enthusiasm was characteristic of the baby boomer generation we
belong to; our eventual disappointment/alienation was characteristic
of many generations of would-be reformers in the Movement.
You are right, of course. We are a generation of would be reformers
whose well intended efforts always seem to end up in disappointment.
However, I think that we did make a fundamental change--no doubt in the
TS (Pasadena), and also in ULT. I think we also made our mark on the
TS (Adyar), regardless of their efforts to undermine what we were trying
to do. Because of our efforts, people from the diverse Theosophical
Organizations (including Adyar Theosophists) have come together in a way
they had not done before--even in the time of Purucker's fraternization
movement, there was never the same ease of inter-Theosophical
fraternization that we have now. After twenty years, there are now
Theosophists who never had any idea that things were once very different.
The effort continues through the ULT inter-Theosophical conferences, and
on the even playing field of the internet Bulletin Boards. I recall
that the idea was originally hatched in an all night talking session in
the Coker's kitchen when they were still in Maryland. John proposed it.
I remember John making the point that because the internet is an even
playing field, whatever was accomplished there could never be controlled
by anyone. He was right. Remember when the Wheaton headquarters tried
to set up a "regulated" Theosophical Bulletin Board? Participants got
tied of having their messages censored, and it appears that their
discussion board has since been dropped. When the Cokers relocated to
Pasadena, John got with Kim Titchnell and Eldon and set up the first
Theosophical discussion Board. I remember that first meeting (you were
there too) in the Titchnell house in Pasadena when we all got our first
lessons on how to install and program the dial-up software and how to
send and receive emails. Eldon programmed mine for me. John was the
first Theosophical discussion board host. That was almost twenty years
ago.
--j
kpauljohnson wrote:
Hey,
Thanks to JHE for the lengthy and informative reminiscence. As a
bit player in the Networking events of the 1980s I can add the East
Coast perspective. Michael Revere, a ULT associate from New York,
published for a short time a magazine encouraging Theosophical
networking, which came to my attention around 1985. John and Nancy
Coker, then of Maryland and now of the Pasadena HQ, had already been
networking on a local level with Adyar and ULT Theosophists, and I
joined them in some cooperative programs. Claire Walker was then in
Maryland and very pro-cooperation. We had a series of conferences
in the region in the mid-80s and Michael came down for one in 1986.
(Later other ULT members participated but alas made nasty scenes a
couple of times leaving the other participants with a bad taste.)
He, the Cokers, and I all participated in the Theosophical Network
magazine with Rick Nurrie and Ken Small. (Somehow I never met
Eldon, which I regret.) We were inspired by the cassette tapes of
the Ojai 1984 conference, and Michael traveled across the country
meeting people in all branches of the Theosophical Movement. I got
especially interested in Theosophical history and attended three
conferences in London organized by Leslie Price in the late 1980s.
All were attended by a mixture of various types of Theosophists and
non-Theosophists; Leslie was an important figure in the Networking
developments of the decade.
The impression I got from Pasadena HQ at first was that some members
were disturbed by our effrontery in organizing such cooperative
events, but Grace Knoche was supportive and invited us to Pasadena
for a day of discussion with staff in 1986. The 1988 SD conference
was a clear indication of Pasadena's subsequent commitment to
networking.
But in the 1990s, despite some official cooperation as for example
in the Parliament of Religions, the energy behind the Networking
movement dissipated. With the Cokers' move to Pasadena and mine to
south-central Virginia, the Frederick and Tidewater branches of the
Pasadena TS withered away. Michael Revere married and started a
family and I haven't heard anything from him in years. Rick Nurrie
and Ken Small had a falling out and Rick left the Theosophical
movement entirely, focusing his energies on a magazine he and his
wife founded. I continued to lecture regularly for the DC and
Maryland lodges and the Charlotte Study Center in the 90s, but the
latter failed to survive the departure of John and Louise Mead, and
invitations from the former stopped in 1999. Betty Bland had
attended the last one I gave and was very friendly to me, but I
suspect some Wheaton influence behind the ending of invitations from
the two Adyar lodges.
The feeling I got, based on some confidential conversations with
various people, is that Wheaton "befriended" the Networking effort
only to undermine it, and that John Algeo was regarded as the person
who behind the scenes most opposed it. The majority of those most
active in the 1980s efforts to insure the healthy survival of the
Theosophical movement have fallen by the wayside.
HTH,
Paul
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application