Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt01076)

Hi John,
Yes I agree, I think this was a technique that discouraged any
challenge to his authority and what CWL did was to trivialise and
distort the teachings of these traditions including the Trans
Himalayan tradition of HPB Adept teachers.

CWL and Annie Besant were seen as the mouthpiece of these Beings and
so what we got was not the teachings of Maitreya but the imaginings of
CWL and Annie Besant, as much as many people may not like to hear it.

Perry




--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, samblo@c... wrote:
> Perry,
> You know it's funny I don't remember the 6th Patriarch of the
Mahayana, or 
> Bodhidharma, or any one else in any form of Buddhism taking any
thing to 
> Lord Maitreya for corrections. Isn't this a very unique assertion
and a detour 
> from the teaching on Maitreya? 
> 
> John
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]