Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00976)

Dear Krishtar
But didn't HPB and the Masters say not to practice clairvoyance unless under the tutorship of one who understands and can explain the phenomenon, as apparently it is easily misunderstood. Of course, when we all have clairvoyance we can test CWL's theories but up until that point of self realisation, all we can do is question the validity of the person who is saying it.
I agree with Paul that we are reinforcing CWL's shadow over the TS, and I suppose, if we are going to call ourselves Theosophists, then we must study the source from which Theosophy arose, namely HPB and the Masters and leaveLeadbeaterism to the Leadbeaterists.
Cass

krishtar <krishtar_a@brturbo.com> wrote:

High folks

There is one safe way to discover if the impressions about the after-life-states ( related by CWL in books so much criticized as The Astral Plane and others ) were real or a mindīs fantasy:
Develop your own psychic potencialities at most and stop criticizing a deadman!
It will not drive us anywhere.
Comparisons are healthy but insisting in pure criticism is sick.
In all this mere criticizing, in what point are we being better than CWL?
Most of us here trying to criticize the controversies cannot even see the auric field of a candle!
The truest theosophists in the planet are not in a list doing what we are doing.


Krishtar

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links








		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]