theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World meaning of "Taking the piss"

Jan 26, 2005 05:59 PM
by Cass Silva


Dear Dennis
Thanks for enlightening me on bladders. I had no idea that men had two. I have responded below
Regards
Cass

Dennis Kier <dennw3k@earthlink.net> wrote:


Message below>


What I was SAYING, was that men have TWO "bladders" to contend with,
while women only have ONE.

With men, there is the bladder containing the urine, and another
containing the sperm (and associated fluids). I believe that this is
contained in the testes. It is smaller than the Unrine Bladder, and in
young men fills up faster, and gives young men (and boys over age 10)
a lot of problems with unwanted erections, and unwanted thoughts when
they are trying to think of homework [math, and other school work],
and also interferes in times of tests at school. When it is full,
nature has provided that it torments men to empty it in one way or
another. But, then, the Urine bladder that both men and women have
also signals to the individual that it is time to empty it, but in a
much different way.

======================================================

Perhaps if you had mentioned a Urine and a Sperm bladder your explanation would have been clearer.

Also perplexed about your reasoning in regard to UNWANTED ERECTIONS, UNWANTED THOUGHTS, I can understand that if you were doing a test and couldnt concentrate because your mind was drifting below your navel instead of upwards to your brain that it might become a bit of a problem. But it has been my experience with the male species that there is no such thing as an Unwanted Erection. However, there is always the exception to the rule.
================================================================
CWL tried to explain this about the boys being distracted from
studying their school work to Annie Besant, but being a typical
female, she had a SNIT FIT, and having absolutely NO sympathy with the
sufferings of the young, made him promise not to enlighten the boys in
his charge about ways to alleievate this problem that they were
having. Let Them Suffer, was evidently her feelings, and making this
simple mechanical problem into a Vast Moral Issue.

==================================================================

You really can't be serious about the sufferings of the young. Surely masturbation is something that does not need to be taught, surely if you have an itch you scratch it, you dont need anyone to show you how to scratch? Baby boys do it from 12 weeks old. I don't agree that he alleviated this so-called problem, by teaching them the pleasure of orgasm, in fact, I would think it would encourage more pleasure. This simple mechanical problem could have been solved by the boys themselves, he could have explained to them, without a hands on approach, that masturbation was preferable to intercourse. Which in itself is ridiculous because a 10 year old boy wouldnt know what intercourse was or how to have intercourse, and CWL clearly did not have interest in setting before the boys, young girls, for spiritual enlightenment (thank god for that!).

============================================================

What is a typical female? If, and I say, if, she had a snit fit, it would have been more to do with the moral and shameful issue of a teacher handling his young protoges, and the legal ramifications of bringing the TS under scrutiny , rather than, as you say, the sufferings of the boys.





Dennis





Yahoo! Groups Links










---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application