Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00822)

--- In theos-talk "Daniel H. Caldwell" wrote:

> As far as the contention that the
> reprints are "bad photocopies" or of "low
> quality", if anyone has bought copies of the 
> Kessinger reprints of HPB's LUCIFER, Volumes
> I and II, these two volumes are nicely
> reproduced. I was amazed at how well they
> were reproduced. Maybe I am more easily
> impressed than others?? 

I haven't seen the reprints you have mentioned but I mean things like 
books beginning not from the first page (probably lacking preface), 
big pages with the small print at the center of them (pocket-book 
reproduced on the A4 sheets) and so on. Often the title page is also 
missing and we cant determine from whci printing the copy was made.
I understand that the quailty of the print itself depends on the state 
of the original, but it is not the case.