Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00600)

Hallo all,

Maybe it is because Alice A. Bailey wrote the following in her book
"The Unfinished Autobiography" - especially the pages 170-173
http://laluni.helloyou.ws/netnews/bk/autobiography/auto1059.html
> :-)
There has also been in the past a strong tendency of "take overs" happening
in TS groups where Alice A. Beiley study-classes were allowed in the name
of fredom of thought and debate.
Perhaps freedom of thought and debate is only allowed within the limits 
dictated by
a certain elite group within TS. This limit was also mentioned by Blavatsky
although I am certain that Blavatsky was referring to another kind of limit.
A more - explanatory kind of limit - if you ask me. And not a silent, 
ignoring or dictating one.
> :-)

from
M. Sufilight with peace and love...

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "kpauljohnson" <kpauljohnson@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 4:11 PM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Alice Bailey & the Adyar Society (ES jealousy)


> > Can anyone shine some light on this?
> >
> > Perry
> Hi Perry,
>
> Perhaps Jerry H-E can explain further, but I recall years ago that
> he explained the otherwise inexplicable hostility towards Bailey in
> the Adyar TS. Inexplicable, that is, because she seems to rile the
> powers that be more than Steiner, the Prophets, Purucker, etc. etc.
> whereas her teachings are actually more in line with Adyar/ES/CWL
> orthodoxy than all those other claimants to Mahatmic inspiration.
>
> That similarity is actually at the root of the hostility, because
> Bailey was an ES member and after leaving the TS incorporated secret
> Leadbeaterian doctrines into her writings. Thus she was regarded as
> a traitor to the ES and the Masters. Sounds very plausible, and
> since ES members are not going to tell us who's on their s--tlist
> and in what order, guesswork is all we have left.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links