Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00203)

Dec 9 2005

Re: disasters and distortions  
axial displacement up to 30 Degrees

Many thanks Lenny,


Its as I thought also.



Dallas

========================================
 

-----Original Message-----
From: leonmaurer@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 1:42 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: Re: disasters and distortions


In a message dated 01/08/05 4:45:22 PM, dalval14@earthlink.net writes:


> Re: axial displacement up to 30 Degrees.

>I have not seen that particular hypothesis. But, I am asking friend Leon
>Maurer if it is plausible.

>Dallas

====================================

Answer:	

There are so many possibilities, that it is hard to say whether one or the 
other has ever occurred. In any case, I have never heard of any verified 
observations that the inner or outer layers revolve at different rates. 

One possibility, however, is that, since the core of the earth is liquid at 
varying temperatures, densities and viscosity's, its rotation at different 
depths could lag behind the rotation of the outer solid shell due to
frictional 
and turbulent forces. Whether or not this rotational disparity could result
in 
pole shift is anyone's guess.  

Another possibility is that the different viscosity's and densities, coupled

with such lag, along with the precessional wobble, could cause the core to 
change the Earth's center of gravity over long periods of time. If this is
so, 
then it could cause an imbalance that might change the precession of the 
current poles and thus an adjustment that resets the Earth's rotation on
another 
axis. Of course, there are other possibilities, such as close cometary
passes, 
near collision with an extraterrestrial body, planetoid, asteroid, etc.,
that 
could cause a pole shift.  

However, the only evidence we have that such pole shifts may have occurred
in 
the past (other than shifts of magnetic polarity) is the vast belts of 
earthquakes and volcanoes at different great circles around the Earth that
could 
represent previous shifting of the Earths equator and the consequent
settling, 
rising, and cracking of its surface, as the new equator swells and expands
and 
the old equator shrinks and contracts.  

The only reason we might accept such a shift as up to 30 degrees would be if

we found it consistent with the radial angle of separation between the
various 
earthquake and volcanic belts that night indicate such pole shifts occurring

in the past.  

But, at the moment -- since such belts could be attributed to plate tectonic

movements and collisions (although, this theory is still controversial** and

may or may not be entirely true) -- all this is no more than speculation,
and 
has no valid scientific basis of credibility to justify or verify it.  

That's the best I can do. Hope it helps,

Lenny

** http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/index.html
http://www.mantleplumes.org/Philosophy.html