Theos-Talk Archives (January 2005 Message tt00161)

Jan 7 2005

Dear Mauri:

Re: axial displacement up to 30 Degrees.

I have not seen that particular hypothesis. But, I am asking friend Leon
Maurer if it is plausible.

The "25,868 year "wobble" of the earth's pole and axial direction is well
known, but whether the inner and outer layers of the Earth revolve at
variance to each other I do not know. Problems of heat and friction might
arise ?


Dallas

Cc: Mr. L. Maurer for favor of consideraton

==========================

-----Original Message-----
From: Mauri [mailto:mhart@idirect.ca] 
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 6:07 AM
To: study@blavatsky.net
Subject: [bn-study] Re: disasters and distortions



Reed Carson wrote:

> It is said by scientists that the inner core of the earth is rotating on 
> an axis that is 30 degrees different from the axis of rotation of the 
> crust. Scientists are worried that there might be a violent shift to 
> get the two into alignment. That of course would be disastrous. Is it 
> possible that "divine powers" protected us and will be trying to get the 
> big shift broken down into smaller shifts? The recent tsunami coming 
> from a "smaller" shift? I wouldn't be surprised.

Graham Hancock in his FINGERPRINTS OF 
THE GODS also mentions a 30 degree shift 
in the poles that resulted in the 
freezing of the current north pole area 
and the Antarctic continent. Apparently 
that shift was sudden enough to have 
frozen animals with food in their 
mouths. Among the various side effects 
of that shift: apparently flooding and 
heavy rains brought on by melting ice.
Geologists are in agreement that the 
erosion on the Sphinx (evident under the 
repair work and elsewhere) was the 
result of heavy rains.

W.Dallas TenBroeck wrote, in part:
> Dec 31 2004
>
> Part 2 -- ANCIENT CATACLYSMS
>

Dallas, thanks for all that. What about
the theory that the continent of
Antarctica may have shifted on the
lithosphere (3 mile thick outer crust of
the globe) southward from a previously
far more northerly position where it was
shown in copies of ancient maps (which
in turn were copies of copies, etc,
apparently) to have been uncovered by
ice, showing rivers, mountains and
islands. The maps I'm referring to are:
Piri Reis, Oronteus Finaeus, Mercator,
Buache. Also, as might be well known,
evidence of trees have been discovered
under the ice in Antarctica. Apparently
the north pole used to be over the
Hudson's Bay area as recently as the Ice
Age, which meant that much of Antarctica
would have been temperate as the south
pole would have then been much farther
towards the Pacific side of the
continent. So I'm wondering if there
has been a series of southward shifts,
over hundreds of thousands or millions
of years (possibly along with tectonic
shifts) of the land masses now know as
Antarctica. Apparently there are
theories to the effect that the build-up
of ice in the poles triggers shifts of
various kinds, some fast, some slow. 
For more info on those theories, see 
Graham Hancock's FINGERPRINTS OF THE GODS.

Speculatively,
Mauri














---
Distributed by Blavatsky Net P.O. Box 749 Dover Plains NY 12522 USA
You are currently subscribed to bn-study as: [dalval14@earthlink.net]
To unsubscribe, forward this message to
leave-bn-study-7560482L@lists.lyris.net